Differences in SMA-like polymer architecture dictate the conformational changes exhibited by the membrane protein rhodopsin encapsulated in lipid nano-particles.
Differences in SMA-like polymer architecture dictate the conformational changes exhibited by the membrane protein rhodopsin encapsulated in lipid nano-particles.
复制标题
SMA类聚合物结构的不同决定了包裹在脂质纳米颗粒中的膜蛋白视紫红质的构象变化。
DOI:
10.1039/d1nr02419a
复制
发表时间:
2021-08-21
期刊:
影响因子:
6.7
通讯作者:
Wheatley M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Grime RL ;Logan RT ;Nestorow SA ;Sridhar P ;Edwards PC ;Tate CG ;Klumperman B ;Dafforn TR ;Poyner DR ;Reeves PJ ;Wheatley M
Membrane proteins are of fundamental importance to cellular processes and nano-encapsulation strategies that preserve their native lipid bilayer environment are particularly attractive for studying and exploiting these proteins. Poly(styrene-co-maleic acid) (SMA) and related polymers poly(styrene-co-(N-(3-N′,N′-dimethylaminopropyl)maleimide)) (SMI) and poly(diisobutylene-alt-maleic acid) (DIBMA) have revolutionised the study of membrane proteins by spontaneously solubilising membrane proteins direct from cell membranes within nanoscale discs of native bilayer called SMA lipid particles (SMALPs), SMILPs and DIBMALPs respectively. This systematic study shows for the first time, that conformational changes of the encapsulated protein are dictated by the solubilising polymer. The photoactivation pathway of rhodopsin (Rho), a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), comprises structurally-defined intermediates with characteristic absorbance spectra that revealed conformational restrictions with styrene-containing SMA and SMI, so that photoactivation proceeded only as far as metarhodopsin-I, absorbing at 478 nm, in a SMALP or SMILP. In contrast, full attainment of metarhodopsin-II, absorbing at 382 nm, was observed in a DIBMALP. Consequently, different intermediate states of Rho could be generated readily by simply employing different SMA-like polymers. Dynamic light-scattering and analytical ultracentrifugation revealed differences in size and thermostability between SMALP, SMILP and DIBMALP. Moreover, encapsulated Rho exhibited different stability in a SMALP, SMILP or DIBMALP. Overall, we establish that SMA, SMI and DIBMA constitute a ‘toolkit’ of solubilising polymers, so that selection of the appropriate solubilising polymer provides a spectrum of useful attributes for studying membrane proteins. Using the GPCR rhodopsin as an exemplar, SMA SMI and DIBMA constitute a ‘tool-kit’ of structurally-related solubilising polymers, with each providing different advantages for studying membrane proteins encapsulated in lipid particles.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4
作者:
Jamshad M;Charlton J;Lin YP;Routledge SJ;Bawa Z;Knowles TJ;Overduin M;Dekker N;Dafforn TR;Bill RM;Poyner DR;Wheatley M
通讯作者:
Wheatley M
影响因子:
6.7
作者:
Hall SCL ;Tognoloni C ;Charlton J ;Bragginton ÉC ;Rothnie AJ ;Sridhar P ;Wheatley M ;Knowles TJ ;Arnold T ;Edler KJ ;Dafforn TR
通讯作者:
Dafforn TR
影响因子:
10.8
作者:
Orwick-Rydmark, Marcella;Lovett, Janet E.;Watts, Anthony
通讯作者:
Watts, Anthony
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Routledge, Sarah J.;Jamshad, Mohammed;Wheatley, Mark
通讯作者:
Wheatley, Mark
DOI:
10.1016/j.bbamem.2021.183602
发表时间:
2021-07-01
期刊:
Biochimica et biophysica acta. Biomembranes
影响因子:
--
作者:
Dilworth MV;Findlay HE;Booth PJ
通讯作者:
Booth PJ