Comparative longitudinal study of 2 methods of scheduling maintenance visits; 2-year data.
Comparative longitudinal study of 2 methods of scheduling maintenance visits; 2-year data.
复制标题
两种安排维护访问方法的纵向比较研究；
DOI：
10.1111/j.1600-051x.1986.tb00867.x
复制
发表时间：
1986
影响因子：
6.7
通讯作者：
Laster,L
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Listgarten,MA;Levin,S;Schifter,CC;Sullivan,P;Evian,CI;Rosenberg,ES;Laster,L
这份报告比较了两组不同维护计划的牙周炎患者的临床和微生物状况。对照组(C)43例，每3个月进行一次预防。40名试验(T)受试者根据新鲜的龈下刮片中螺旋体和/或活动杆的比例，按灵活的时间表给予这项服务。两组均每6个月进行一次临床和微生物学检查。这份报告提供了基线、1年和2年的数据。总体而言，两组的平均值彼此之间没有显著差异。在这项研究的前两年，两组患者的胃肠道指数和PLI得分都有类似的增长。在基线和2年检查之间，没有发现探诊深度的变化。然而，通过探查确定的依恋水平在两组中都有轻微的增加。两组在基线和随后的检查中也表现出相似的细菌形态比例。疾病复发，定义为在两年期间任何牙齿表面从基线开始探查深度增加3 mm或更多，在C组往往比T组更常见(15/43C和9/40T受试者)。然而，两组之间的比例差异在统计学上并不显著。T组中有疾病复发的患者的螺旋体比例高于无疾病复发的患者(20.2%对9.8%，P<；0.01)。如果两组联合检查，这种比例的差异仍然存在，但只有边缘意义(16.0%对10.5%，p=0.05)。当单独检查C组时，差异没有达到统计学意义。在基线螺旋体百分比与未来疾病复发的相关性方面，两组之间的差异可能是由于召回计划的不同，定期每三个月预防一次更有可能干扰预期的组织对常驻龈下微生物区系的反应。两年后，尽管两组平均召回7次，但自上次预防以来，C组平均为2.4个月，而T组为13.7个月。在基线检查时，没有其他标准与疾病复发显著相关。
This report compares the clinical and microbiological status of 2 groups of subjects with treated periodontitis on different maintenance schedules. 43 control (C) subjects were given prophylaxes every 3 months. 40 test (T) subjects were given this service on a flexible schedule according to the proportions of spirochetes and/or motile rods in fresh smears of subgingival scrapings. Both groups were examined every 6 months clinically and microbiologically. This report presents base line, 1‐ and 2‐year data. Generally, mean values for both groups did not differ significantly from one another. Both groups exhibited comparable increases in GI and PLI scores during the first 2 years of this study. No change in probing depth was noted between base line and the 2‐year examination. However, a slight increase in attachment level, as determined by probing, was noted in both groups. Both groups also exhibited similar proportions of bacterial morphotypes at base line and subsequent examinations.Disease recurrence, defined as an increase in probing depth of 3 mm or more from base line on any tooth surface during the 2‐year period, tended to be more prevalent in the C than in the T group (15/43 C and 9/40 T subjects). However, the proportional difference between the groups was not statistically significant. Subjects with disease recurrence in the T group had greater proportions of spirochetes at base line than subjects in the same group without disease recurrence (20.2% versus 9.8%,P< 0.01). This difference in proportions persisted if both groups were examined jointly, but was only of borderline significance (16.0% versus 10.5%,p= 0.05). The difference did not reach statistical significance when C subjects alone were examined. The difference between groups with respect to correlation of spirochete % at base line and future disease recurrence may be due to differences in the recall schedule, with regular tri‐monthly prophylaxes more likely to interfere with the expected tissue response to the resident subgingival microbiota. After 2 years, although both groups averaged about 7 recall visits, the time elapsed since the last prophylaxis averaged 2.4 months for the C versus 13.7 months for the T group. No other criteria examined at base line were significantly correlated with disease recurrence.
登录
查看更多内容
受控口腔卫生程序对成人牙周病进展的影响：第三年和最后一年后的结果。
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1971
期刊：
The Journal of Periodontology
影响因子：
--
作者：
J. D. Suomi;J. Greene;J. Vermillion;J. Doyle;J. Change;E. C. Leatherwood
通讯作者：
E. C. Leatherwood
影响因子：
6.7
作者：
LISTGARTEN, MA;HELLDEN, L
通讯作者：
HELLDEN, L
与牙周炎症患者的常规或抗菌家庭治疗相结合，对龈下菌斑进行相差显微镜评估。
影响因子：
3.5
作者：
L. Wolff;C. Bandt;B. Pihlstrom;L. Brayer
通讯作者：
L. Brayer
影响因子：
6.7
作者：
GOODSON, JM;TANNER, ACR;SOCRANSKY, SS
通讯作者：
SOCRANSKY, SS
人类牙周病的一些微生物学和组织病理学特征。
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1980
期刊：
The Journal of Periodontology
影响因子：
--
作者：
J. Lindhe;B. Liljenberg;Max A. Listgarten
通讯作者：
Max A. Listgarten