Immigration, Nationalism, and Politics in Scotland
Immigration, Nationalism, and Politics in Scotland
复制标题
苏格兰的移民、民族主义和政治
DOI：
10.1057/9781137358530_12
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
1.4
通讯作者：
M. Rosie
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Eve Hepburn;M. Rosie
苏格兰因在英国境内的政策问题上遵循独特且可以说是进步的道路而受到称赞（Bradbury 和 Mitchell，2001 年；Keating，2010 年）。然而，虽然教育、医疗保健和环境政策等关键的权力下放政策问题受到了相当大的关注（Paterson，1997；Greer，2005；McEwen，Bomberg和Swenden，2010；Cairney，2011），但在移民等保留领域仍存在显着的研究空白。鉴于有令人信服的证据表明苏格兰正在制定一种独特的移民方法，特别是移民的社会和政治融合方法，这是一项关键的监督。尽管移民问题由威斯敏斯特保留，但其对下放政策问题的影响已导致苏格兰各党派在此问题上表明立场。显然，苏格兰政党的立场与英国政党的规范有很大差异。
Scotland has been vaunted for following a distinctive — and arguably progressive — path on policy issues within the United Kingdom (Bradbury and Mitchell, 2001; Keating, 2010). However, while key devolved policy issues such as education, healthcare, and environmental policy have received considerable attention (Paterson, 1997; Greer, 2005; McEwen, Bomberg and Swenden, 2010; Cairney, 2011), there is a notable research gap on reserved areas such as immigration. This is a key oversight given compelling evidence that Scotland is developing a distinctive approach to immigration, and in particular the social and political integration of migrants. Although immigration is reserved to Westminster, its impact on devolved policy issues has caused Scotland’s parties to take a stance on this issue. Markedly, the positions of Scottish parties have diverged considerably from the UK party norm.
政党竞争和移民立场：战略优势和空间位置
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
Odmalm P
通讯作者：
Odmalm P