The clinical neuropsychologist's dilemma
The clinical neuropsychologist's dilemma
复制标题
临床神经心理学家的困境
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2005
影响因子：
2.6
通讯作者：
B. Wilson
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
B. Wilson
学术神经心理学家越来越多地参与认知神经科学（并且成为认知神经科学的一部分）。神经影像学目前已成为重要议题，神经可塑性是神经科学中一个非常热门的领域，许多神经心理学家致力于研究脑损伤的动物模型。临床神经心理学家，特别是那些参与康复的临床神经心理学家，通常会告诉你，他们的工作需要以理论为指导，否则他们可能会被指责过于务实。临床神经心理学家面临的基本问题是哪种理论或哪些理论对于他们所服务的患者和家庭最相关和最有用？虽然大多数临床神经心理学家似乎认为认知神经科学对临床神经心理学实践有直接或至少间接的益处，但本文论点的一部分是表明认知神经科学的益处并不像有时声称的那么大。当我与学术界和临床神经心理学家一起工作时，我坚信理论应该与临床实践相关，同时希望神经心理康复在学术界眼中受到尊重。然而，在治疗脑损伤患者时，有时很难实施，甚至很难看到认知神经科学发现的相关性。
Academic neuropsychologists are increasingly engaged in (and are part of) cognitive neuroscience. Neuroimaging is currently high on the agenda, neuroplasticity is a very topical field within neuroscience, and a number of neuropsychologists work on animal models of brain injury. Clinical neuropsychologists, particularly those involved in rehabilitation, will usually tell you that their work needs to be guided by theory or else they risk the accusation of being simply pragmatic. The fundamental question for clinical neuropsychologists is which theory or theories are most relevant and useful for the patients and families with whom they work? While it would seem that most clinical neuropsychologists consider cognitive neuroscience to be of direct or at least indirect benefit to clinical neuropsychological practice, it is part of the argument of this paper to suggest that the benefits are less substantial than is sometimes claimed. As I work with both academic and clinical neuropsychologists, I hold the conviction that theory should be relevant to clinical practice while, at the same time, wanting neuropsychological rehabilitation to be respectable in the eyes of the academic community. However, when treating a patient with brain injury it is sometimes a struggle to implement, or even see the relevance of findings from cognitive neuroscience.
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.90.8.3593
发表时间：
1993-04
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
A. Mogilner;J. Grossman;U. Ribary;M. Joliot;Jens Volkmann;Dave Rapaport;R. Beasley;R. Llinás
通讯作者：
A. Mogilner;J. Grossman;U. Ribary;M. Joliot;Jens Volkmann;Dave Rapaport;R. Beasley;R. Llinás