The fallacy of “there are no candidates”: Institutional pathways of Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino doctorate earners
The fallacy of “there are no candidates”: Institutional pathways of Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino doctorate earners
复制标题
“没有候选人”的谬论:黑人/非裔美国人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔博士获得者的制度路径
DOI:
10.1002/jee.20491
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
3.4
通讯作者:
Murzi, Homero
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fleming, Gabriella Coloyan;Patrick, Anita D.;Grote, Dustin;Denton, Maya;Knight, David;Lee, Walter;Borrego, Maura;Murzi, Homero
BackgroundDespite many initiatives to improve graduate student and faculty diversity in engineering, there has been little or no change in the percentage of people from racially minoritized backgrounds in either of these groups.Purpose/HypothesisThe purpose of this paper is to counter the scarcity fallacy, in which institutions blame the “shortage” of qualified people from traditionally marginalized backgrounds for their own lack of representation, related to prospective PhD students and prospective faculty from traditionally marginalized groups. This study identifies the BS‐to‐PhD and PhD‐to‐tenure‐track‐faculty institutional pathways of Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino engineering doctorate recipients.Design/MethodUsing the US Survey of Earned Doctorates, we tracked the BS‐to‐PhD institutional pathways of 3952 Black/African American and 5732 Hispanic/Latino engineering PhD graduates. We also used the Survey of Doctorate Recipients to track the PhD‐to‐tenure‐track faculty pathways of 104 Black/African American and 211 Hispanic/Latino faculty.ResultsThe majority of Black/African American and Hispanic/Latino PhD graduates in this study did not earn their BS degrees from Top 25 institutions, but rather from Not Top 25, non‐US, and minority‐serving institutions. The results also show the relatively small proportion of PhD earners and faculty members who move into highly ranked institutions after earning a bachelor's degree from outside this set of institutions.ConclusionsThe findings of this study have important implications for graduate student and faculty recruitment by illustrating that recruitment from a narrow range of institutions (i.e., Top 25 institutions) is unlikely to result in increased diversity among racially minoritized PhDs and faculty in engineering.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Tatiana Melguizo
通讯作者:
Tatiana Melguizo
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
Vasti Torres;Desiree D. Zerquera
通讯作者:
Desiree D. Zerquera
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
Whitney E. Wall Bortz;D. Knight;Chelsea Lyles;Timothy Kinoshita;N. H. Choe;Maya Denton;M. Borrego
通讯作者:
M. Borrego
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Black, Dan A.;Smith, Jeffrey A.
通讯作者:
Smith, Jeffrey A.
影响因子:
1.4
作者:
Marisa K. Orr;S. Lord;R. Layton;M. Ohland
通讯作者:
M. Ohland