Defining mild stroke: outcomes analysis of treated and untreated mild stroke patients.
Defining mild stroke: outcomes analysis of treated and untreated mild stroke patients.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.01.037
复制
发表时间:
2015-06
影响因子:
2.5
通讯作者:
Meyer, Brett C.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Spokoyny, Ilana;Raman, Rema;Ernstrom, Karin;Khatri, Pooja;Meyer, Dawn M.;Hemmen, Thomas M.;Meyer, Brett C.
关键词:
Mild deficit is a relative contraindication to administration of IV rtPA for acute ischemic stroke. However, what constitutes “mild” deficit is vague. Prior studies showed patients with mild strokes have substantial disability rates at hospital discharge and at 90 days. We investigated whether the application of a new definition altered the rates of disability overall, and assessed the effects of thrombolysis. This analysis included all adult acute ischemic stroke patients from a prospective registry of consecutive patients (UCSD SPOTRIAS database, 2003-2014) with 90-day mRS score available who were defined as “mild” using either: NIHSS 0-5 or a TREAT Task Force definition (NIHSS 0-5 and non-disabling based on pre-specified syndromes). Dichotomized 90-day mRS were compared between treated and untreated patients using the two definitions. Of 802 ischemic stroke patients with mRS scores available, 184 had baseline mRS(0) and met TREAT criteria; 45(24.5%) were rtPA-treated. Among treated patients, 35.6% had 90-day mRS(2-6), versus 28.8% in the untreated group, a non-significant difference after adjusting for baseline NIHSS (p=0.47). None of the 45 treated patients had symptomatic hemorrhage. Outcomes were similar using the simpler NIHSS 0-5 definition. About one-third of mild stroke patients were not functionally independent at 90 days, irrespective of treatment or mild definition applied, calling into question the treatment efficacy of IV rtPA for mild strokes as well as what constitutes an appropriate definition of “mild”. Randomized studies are necessary to determine rtPA treatment efficacy in mild stroke patients.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
8.3
作者:
Re-examining Acute Eligibility for Thrombolysis (TREAT) Task Force:;Levine SR;Khatri P;Broderick JP;Grotta JC;Kasner SE;Kim D;Meyer BC;Panagos P;Romano J;Scott P;NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trial Investigators
通讯作者:
NINDS rt-PA Stroke Trial Investigators
影响因子:
9.9
作者:
Barber, PA;Zhang, J;Buchan, AM
通讯作者:
Buchan, AM
影响因子:
6.7
作者:
Frank, Benedikt;Fulton, Rachael L.;Lees, Kennedy R.
通讯作者:
Lees, Kennedy R.
影响因子:
8.3
作者:
Khatri P;Kleindorfer DO;Yeatts SD;Saver JL;Levine SR;Lyden PD;Moomaw CJ;Palesch YY;Jauch EC;Broderick JP
通讯作者:
Broderick JP
影响因子:
8.3
作者:
Leira, Enrique C.;Ludwig, Bryan R.;Adams, Harold P., Jr.
通讯作者:
Adams, Harold P., Jr.