Validation of design methods: lessons from medicine

Validation of design methods: lessons from medicine
复制标题

设计方法的验证:医学教训

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
C. Dym
C. Dym
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
D. Frey;C. Dym

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本文讨论了设计方法的验证。验证中的挑战和机遇通过与医学研究和开发进行类比来说明。具体的验证实践,如临床研究和人类疾病模型的使用进行了讨论,包括具体的方法来适应他们的工程设计。探讨了设计研究的三个活跃领域的影响:鲁棒设计,公理化设计和设计决策。有人认为,医学研究和开发具有高度发达的,有据可查的验证方法,许多具体的做法,如自然实验和基于模型的评估,可以有利地适用于工程设计研究。
This paper discusses the validation of design methods. The challenges and opportunities in validation are illustrated by drawing an analogy to medical research and development. Specific validation practices such as clinical studies and use of models of human disease are discussed, including specific ways to adapt them to engineering design. The implications are explored for three active areas of design research: robust design, axiomatic design, and design decision making. It is argued that medical research and development has highly-developed, well-documented validation methods and that many specific practices such as natural experiments and model-based evaluations can profitably be adapted for use in engineering design research.
DOI: 10.1126/science.283.5400.397
发表时间: 1999-01-15
期刊: Science (Washington D C)
影响因子: --
作者:
Gainetdinov, Raul R.;Wetsel, William C.;Caron, Marc G.
通讯作者: Caron, Marc G.