Smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment reveals mental health benefits of birdlife.

Smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment reveals mental health benefits of birdlife.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1038/s41598-022-20207-6
复制
发表时间:
2022-10-27
期刊:
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Mechelli, Andrea
Mechelli, Andrea
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hammoud, Ryan;Tognin, Stefania;Burgess, Lucie;Bergou, Nicol;Smythe, Michael;Gibbons, Johanna;Davidson, Neil;Afifi, Alia;Bakolis, Ioannis;Mechelli, Andrea

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

人们对每天与鸟类接触对心理健康的好处知之甚少。以前的研究通常依赖于回顾性问卷调查或人工设置,几乎没有生态有效性。在本研究中,我们使用Urban Mind智能手机应用程序来研究在现实生活中看到或听到鸟类对自我报告的心理健康的影响。在2018年4月至2021年10月期间,1292名参与者共完成了26,856次生态瞬时评估。每天与鸟类接触与心理健康的持久改善有关。这些改善不仅在健康人群中很明显,而且在那些被诊断为抑郁症的人中也很明显,抑郁症是世界上最常见的精神疾病。这些发现对环境和野生动物保护以及精神卫生政策都有潜在的影响。应采取具体措施,保护和增加城市地区日常与鸟类的接触。
The mental health benefits of everyday encounters with birdlife for mental health are poorly understood. Previous studies have typically relied on retrospective questionnaires or artificial set-ups with little ecological validity. In the present study, we used the Urban Mind smartphone application to examine the impact of seeing or hearing birds on self-reported mental wellbeing in real-life contexts. A sample of 1292 participants completed a total of 26,856 ecological momentary assessments between April 2018 and October 2021. Everyday encounters with birdlife were associated with time-lasting improvements in mental wellbeing. These improvements were evident not only in healthy people but also in those with a diagnosis of depression, the most common mental illness across the world. These findings have potential implications for both environmental and wildlife protection and mental healthcare policies. Specific measures, aimed at preserving and increasing everyday encounters with birdlife in urban areas, should be implemented.
DOI: 10.2478/bjmg-2018-0010
发表时间: 2018-06
期刊: Balkan journal of medical genetics : BJMG
影响因子: --
作者:
Zalar B;Blatnik A;Maver A;Klemenc-Ketiš Z;Peterlin B
通讯作者: Peterlin B
DOI: 10.1037/0003-066x.62.2.95
发表时间: 2007-02-01
影响因子: 16.4
作者:
Keyes, Corey L. M.
通讯作者: Keyes, Corey L. M.
流行病学和临床研究中缺少数据的多重归因:潜力和陷阱。
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.b2393
发表时间: 2009-06-29
期刊: BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
影响因子: --
作者:
Sterne JA;White IR;Carlin JB;Spratt M;Royston P;Kenward MG;Wood AM;Carpenter JR
通讯作者: Carpenter JR
DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.515469
发表时间: 2020
影响因子: 5.2
作者:
Islam MM
通讯作者: Islam MM
DOI: 10.1016/s2542-5196(18)30051-2
发表时间: 2018-04-01
影响因子: 25.7
作者:
Sarkar, Chinmoy;Webster, Chris;Gallacher, John
通讯作者: Gallacher, John