Use of Community Listening Sessions to Disseminate Research Findings to Past Participants and Communities.
Use of Community Listening Sessions to Disseminate Research Findings to Past Participants and Communities.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10900-021-01038-4
复制
发表时间：
2022-04
影响因子：
5.9
通讯作者：
Miller ST
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Cunningham-Erves J;Stewart EC;Duke J;Alexander L;Davis J;Wilus D;Wyche-Etheridge K;Miller ST
这个顺序的，解释性混合方法研究的目的是确定非洲裔美国人对研究态度的变化，对医学研究人员和过程的信任，以及在社区倾听会议（CLS）中收到过去的研究结果后立即参与研究的意愿。我们开发并实施了四个cls，共有57名非裔美国人，他们要么是过去的研究参与者，要么是整个社区的成员。在定量（主导）阶段，32名参与者完成了前后调查，其中10名参与者完成了后续半结构化访谈。配对样本t检验和McNemar检验确定了调查前后的双变量差异。主题分析确定了新兴主题，以进一步了解这些差异。(1)临床试验前（M = 26.63, SD = 5.43）和后（M = 28.53, SD = 4.24, p < 0.01）的感知优势显著增加；(2)医学研究人员前后的信任度差异（M = 36.16, SD = 10.40 vs. M = 27.53, SD = 9.37, p < 0.001）。在临床试验的感知缺点和参与意愿方面，前后测试没有显著差异。定性分析得出以下主题：(1)分享研究成果和对研究态度的影响；(2)社区倾听：建立信任的策略；(3)对社区聆听会的满意度。社区倾听会议有望成为一种方法，研究人员可以使用它来同时传播研究成果，并对种族和少数民族的研究观念和潜在参与产生积极影响。
The purpose of this sequential, explanatory mixed methods study is to determine changes in attitudes towards research, trust in medical researchers and the process, and willingness to participate in research among African Americans immediately after receiving past study findings in a community listening session (CLS). We developed and implemented four CLSs with a total of 57 African Americans who were either past research participants or members of the community-at-large. In the quantitative (dominant) phase, 32 participants completed pre-post surveys and 10 of those participants completed the follow-up semi-structured interviews. Paired samples t-tests and McNemar’s test determined bivariate differences between pre- and post-surveys. Thematic analyses determined emerging themes to further understand these differences. There was a significant increase in: (1) perceived advantages of clinical trials pretest (M = 26.63, SD = 5.43) and post-test (M = 28.53, SD = 4.24, p < .01); and (2) in trust in medical researchers from pre to post (M = 36.16, SD = 10.40 vs. M = 27.53, SD = 9.37, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pre- and post-tests as it relates to perceived disadvantages of clinical trials and willingness to participate. Qualitative analysis yielded the following themes: (1) sharing research results and the impact on attitudes towards research; (2) community listening sessions: a trust building strategy; and (3) satisfaction with the community listening session. Community listening sessions hold promise as a method that researchers can use to simultaneously disseminate research findings and positively impact research perceptions and potentially participation among racial and ethnic minorities.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
McDavitt B;Bogart LM;Mutchler MG;Wagner GJ;Green HD Jr;Lawrence SJ;Mutepfa KD;Nogg KA
通讯作者：
Nogg KA
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Mainous, AG;Smith, DW;Tilley, BC
通讯作者：
Tilley, BC
影响因子：
1.7
作者：
Burnett-Hartman, Andrea N.;Blum-Barnett, Erica;McGlynn, Elizabeth A.
通讯作者：
McGlynn, Elizabeth A.
影响因子：
1.3
作者：
Pufall, Erica L.;Jones, Andria Q.;Edge, Victoria L.
通讯作者：
Edge, Victoria L.
影响因子：
3.3
作者：
Stewart, Elizabeth C.;Erves, Jennifer Cunningham;Miller, Stephania T.
通讯作者：
Miller, Stephania T.