Rewards and Creativity: Past, Present, and Future
Rewards and Creativity: Past, Present, and Future
复制标题
奖励和创造力：过去、现在和未来
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Butt
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. A. R. Malik;A. Butt
关于奖励对创造力的影响的研究已经产生了数百项实证研究和对奖励-创造力关系（RCR）的一些评论。大多数评论本质上是回顾性的。他们定量地总结和整合了以前的研究成果，但在很大程度上忽视了对指导未来研究的理论框架的需求。基于329篇论文和书籍章节的发现，目前对这一文献的系统综述旨在弥合这一差距。本文综述了奖励-创造力（RC）研究的理论进展，并将其分为三个不同的阶段：认知视角的出现；行为反驳和趋同。本文指出了现有RC文献中的三个重要空白：(1)个体、群体、组织和国家层面因素的调节作用；(2)认知状态和情感状态的中介作用；(3)缺乏对创造力作为一个多维结构的考虑。基于这些不足，本文提出了一个指导未来钢筋混凝土研究的四因素框架。它确定了RCR的潜在调节者和中介者，并提请注意创造力作为一个多维结构。
Research on the effects of rewards on creativity has resulted in hundreds of empirical studies and several reviews of the reward–creativity relationship (RCR). Most reviews are retrospective in nature. They have quantitatively summarised and integrated previous research findings, but have largely overlooked the need for a theoretical framework to guide future research. The current systematic review of this literature intends to bridge this gap, based on the findings of 329 papers and book chapters. Our review summarises the theoretical developments in reward–creativity (RC) research, and classifies the literature in three distinct phases, i.e. the emergence of the cognitive perspective; behavioural rebuttal, and convergence. The paper identifies three important gaps in the existing RC literature: (1) the moderating effects of individual, group, organisational, and national-level factors; (2) the mediating role of cognitive and affective states; and (3) the lack of consideration of creativity as a multidimensional construct. Based on these gaps, the paper presents a four-factor framework to guide future RC research. It identifies potential moderators and mediators of the RCR, and draws attention to creativity as a multidimensional construct.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
AMABILE, TM;HENNESSEY, BA;GROSSMAN, BS
通讯作者：
GROSSMAN, BS
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
R. Eisenberger;S. Armeli
通讯作者：
R. Eisenberger;S. Armeli
影响因子：
22.4
作者：
Eisenberger, R;Pierce, WD;Cameron, J
通讯作者：
Cameron, J