Trait-Specific Versus Person-Specific Moderators of Cross-Situational Consistency
Trait-Specific Versus Person-Specific Moderators of Cross-Situational Consistency
复制标题
跨情境一致性的特定特质与特定个人的调节因素
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00758.x
复制
发表时间：
1989
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
M. Zuckerman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Koestner;Frank J. Bernieri;M. Zuckerman
跨情境一致性的调节变量可以通过两种不同的方式进行测试：(a)以特质特定的方式来检验特质之间跨情境一致性的差异，或(b)以个人特定的方式来检验人与人之间跨情境一致性的差异。本研究考察了特质维度（“你如何看待自己？”）上私人自评之间差异的调节效应——特质和个人特定的调节效应。以及相应的公众自我评价（“别人怎么看你？”）结果表明，公私差异在特质化条件下对自我同伴认同具有调节作用，即对每个特质而言，差异越大，自我同伴认同越低；而公私差异在个体化条件下对自我同伴认同的调节作用则微乎其微。当所有特质的平均差异作为调节因子时，讨论了特质和个体特异性调节效应方法之间区别的含义
ABSTRACT Moderator variables for cross-situational consistency can be tested m two different ways (a) a trait-specific manner which examines differences in cross-situational consistency among traits, or (b) a person-specific manner which examines differences in cross-situational consistency among people The present study examined moderator effects–both trait- and person-specific–of the discrepancy between private self-ratings on trait dimensions (“How do you see yourself?”) and the corresponding public self-ratings (“How do others see you?”) Agreement between self- and peer ratings served as the dependent variable The results showed that public-private discrepancy moderated self-peer agreement when operationalized in a trait-specific manner, i e, for each trait, higher discrepancy was associated with lower self-peer agreement On the other hand, the results showed only minimal moderator effects when public-private discrepancy was operationalized in a person-specific manner, i e, when mean discrepancy across all traits served as the moderator Implications of the distinction between trait- and person-specific approaches to moderator effects are discussed
特征之间的差异：与法官间一致性相关的属性。
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Funder,DC;Dobroth,KM
通讯作者：
Dobroth,KM