The parental non-equivalence of imprinting control regions during mammalian development and evolution.
The parental non-equivalence of imprinting control regions during mammalian development and evolution.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pgen.1001214
复制
发表时间:
2010-11-18
期刊:
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Bourc'his D
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Schulz R;Proudhon C;Bestor TH;Woodfine K;Lin CS;Lin SP;Prissette M;Oakey RJ;Bourc'his D
In mammals, imprinted gene expression results from the sex-specific methylation of imprinted control regions (ICRs) in the parental germlines. Imprinting is linked to therian reproduction, that is, the placenta and imprinting emerged at roughly the same time and potentially co-evolved. We assessed the transcriptome-wide and ontology effect of maternally versus paternally methylated ICRs at the developmental stage of setting of the chorioallantoic placenta in the mouse (8.5dpc), using two models of imprinting deficiency including completely imprint-free embryos. Paternal and maternal imprints have a similar quantitative impact on the embryonic transcriptome. However, transcriptional effects of maternal ICRs are qualitatively focused on the fetal-maternal interface, while paternal ICRs weakly affect non-convergent biological processes, with little consequence for viability at 8.5dpc. Moreover, genes regulated by maternal ICRs indirectly influence genes regulated by paternal ICRs, while the reverse is not observed. The functional dominance of maternal imprints over early embryonic development is potentially linked to selection pressures favoring methylation-dependent control of maternal over paternal ICRs. We previously hypothesized that the different methylation histories of ICRs in the maternal versus the paternal germlines may have put paternal ICRs under higher mutational pressure to lose CpGs by deamination. Using comparative genomics of 17 extant mammalian species, we show here that, while ICRs in general have been constrained to maintain more CpGs than non-imprinted sequences, the rate of CpG loss at paternal ICRs has indeed been higher than at maternal ICRs during evolution. In fact, maternal ICRs, which have the characteristics of CpG-rich promoters, have gained CpGs compared to non-imprinted CpG-rich promoters. Thus, the numerical and, during early embryonic development, functional dominance of maternal ICRs can be explained as the consequence of two orthogonal evolutionary forces: pressure to tightly regulate genes affecting the fetal-maternal interface and pressure to avoid the mutagenic environment of the paternal germline. In mammals, a subset of genes is expressed from only one chromosomal copy, depending on its parental origin. This process, known as genomic imprinting, results from DNA methylation marks deposited in gametes at regulatory sequences called imprinting control regions (ICRs). Most of the DNA methylation controlling imprinting is established in the oocyte, while very few ICRs are methylated in the sperm. We provided insight into the impact and origins of the parental imbalance in genomic imprinting control. We defined the transcriptome-wide effect of imprinting, during the transition period when the embryo becomes dependent upon maternal resources. We found that maternal ICRs have a vital effect on developmental pathways related to the mother-to-fetus exchanges, while paternal ICRs have a dispersed and non-significant effect at that stage. We evidenced that paternal ICRs are lost at a much faster rate than maternal ICRs during mammalian evolution, probably as a mechanistic consequence of different kinetics of the parental germlines. Our results support the notion that two independent evolutionary forces have led to the numerical and functional dominance of maternal ICRs: a selective advantage of parent-specific regulation of genes important for the fetal-maternal interface and pressure to avoid the mutagenic environment of the paternal germline.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.7
作者:
Arima, Takahiro;Hata, Kenichiro;Wake, Norio
通讯作者:
Wake, Norio
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Bourc'his, D;Xu, GL;Bestor, TH
通讯作者:
Bestor, TH
影响因子:
10.5
作者:
Chotalia, Mita;Smallwood, Sebastien A.;Kelsey, Gavin
通讯作者:
Kelsey, Gavin
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.0404142101
发表时间:
2004-09-28
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Hwang, DG;Green, P
通讯作者:
Green, P
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
Li, LL;Keverne, EB;Surani, MA
通讯作者:
Surani, MA