Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: protocol for a qualitative study.
Exploring mentorship as a strategy to build capacity for knowledge translation research and practice: protocol for a qualitative study.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/1748-5908-4-55
复制
发表时间：
2009-08-19
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Straus SE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gagliardi AR;Perrier L;Webster F;Leslie K;Bell M;Levinson W;Rotstein O;Tourangeau A;Morrison L;Silver IL;Straus SE
全世界的研究资助者、教育工作者、调查人员和决策者已经认识到需要通过建设知识转化研究和实践的能力来提高卫生保健的质量。以同伴为基础的指导是培养KT能力的一种手段。本探索性研究的目的是确定可用于建立KT能力的指导模型，咨询假定的被指导者利益相关者以了解他们的KT指导需求和偏好，并就KT指导策略或计划的内容和格式提出建议，以及如何通过未来的研究对其进行测试。基于管理和社会科学文献中确定的指导目标、过程和结果，以及我们对学术指导的障碍和促进因素的研究，得出了一个概念框架。这些概念将为数据收集和分析提供信息。为了确定设计、实施和评估KT指导的有用模型，我们将回顾1990年至今的社会科学、管理和护理文献，浏览相关期刊的目录，并扫描所有符合条件的研究的参考文献。资格筛选和数据提取将由两名研究者独立进行。半结构化访谈将用于收集有关KT需求的信息，对指导作为知识共享策略的看法，首选的KT指导计划要素，以及来自代表不同学科的临床医生健康服务研究人员的感知障碍。转录本的定性分析将由两名调查人员独立进行，他们将会面比较发现并通过讨论解决分歧。数据将与研究团队共享和讨论，他们的反馈将纳入最终报告。这些发现可以被加拿大和其他地方的大学、研究机构、资助机构和专业组织用于开发、实施和评估KT研究和实践的指导。这项研究将建立一个理论基础，在此基础上，我们和其他人可以比较加强KT指导的干预措施的成本效益。如果取得成功，这一研究计划可能会增加对KT流程的认识、信心和更多的利用，以及KT研究的质量和数量，最终可能导致更好地实施和采用推荐的卫生保健服务。
Research funders, educators, investigators and decision makers worldwide have identified the need to improve the quality of health care by building capacity for knowledge translation (KT) research and practice. Peer-based mentorship represents a vehicle to foster KT capacity. The purpose of this exploratory study is to identify mentoring models that could be used to build KT capacity, consult with putative mentee stakeholders to understand their KT mentorship needs and preferences, and generate recommendations for the content and format of KT mentorship strategies or programs, and how they could be tested through future research. A conceptual framework was derived based on mentoring goals, processes and outcomes identified in the management and social sciences literature, and our research on barriers and facilitators of academic mentorship. These concepts will inform data collection and analysis. To identify useful models by which to design, implement and evaluate KT mentorship, we will review the social sciences, management, and nursing literature from 1990 to current, browse tables of contents of relevant journals, and scan the references of all eligible studies. Eligibility screening and data extraction will be performed independently by two investigators. Semi-structured interviews will be used to collect information about KT needs, views on mentorship as a knowledge sharing strategy, preferred KT mentoring program elements, and perceived barriers from clinician health services researchers representing different disciplines. Qualitative analysis of transcripts will be performed independently by two investigators, who will meet to compare findings and resolve differences through discussion. Data will be shared and discussed with the research team, and their feedback incorporated into final reports. These findings could be used by universities, research institutes, funding agencies, and professional organizations in Canada and elsewhere to develop, implement, and evaluate mentorship for KT research and practice. This research will establish a theoretical basis upon which we and others can compare the cost-effectiveness of interventions that enhance KT mentorship. If successful, this program of research may increase knowledge about, confidence in, and greater utilization of KT processes, and the quality and quantity of KT research, perhaps ultimately leading to better implementation and adoption of recommended health care services.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.7
作者：
Armstrong, Rebecca;Waters, Elizabeth;Keleher, Helen
通讯作者：
Keleher, Helen
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Cooke, Jo
通讯作者：
Cooke, Jo
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Billay, Diane;Myrick, Florence
通讯作者：
Myrick, Florence
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Cooke, Jo;Nancarrow, Susan;Williams, Martin
通讯作者：
Williams, Martin
影响因子：
5.5
作者：
CHAO, GT;WALZ, PM;GARDNER, PD
通讯作者：
GARDNER, PD