A comprehensive re-assessment of the association between vitamin D and cancer susceptibility using Mendelian randomization.
A comprehensive re-assessment of the association between vitamin D and cancer susceptibility using Mendelian randomization.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/s41467-020-20368-w
复制
发表时间:
2021-01-11
影响因子:
16.6
通讯作者:
MacGregor S
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Ong JS;Dixon-Suen SC;Han X;An J;Esophageal Cancer Consortium;23 and Me Research Team;Liyanage U;Dusingize JC;Schumacher J;Gockel I;Böhmer A;Jankowski J;Palles C;O'Mara T;Spurdle A;Law MH;Iles MM;Pharoah P;Berchuck A;Zheng W;Thrift AP;Olsen C;Neale RE;Gharahkhani P;Webb PM;MacGregor S
Previous Mendelian randomization (MR) studies on 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) and cancer have typically adopted a handful of variants and found no relationship between 25(OH)D and cancer; however, issues of horizontal pleiotropy cannot be reliably addressed. Using a larger set of variants associated with 25(OH)D (74 SNPs, up from 6 previously), we perform a unified MR analysis to re-evaluate the relationship between 25(OH)D and ten cancers. Our findings are broadly consistent with previous MR studies indicating no relationship, apart from ovarian cancers (OR 0.89; 95% C.I: 0.82 to 0.96 per 1 SD change in 25(OH)D concentration) and basal cell carcinoma (OR 1.16; 95% C.I.: 1.04 to 1.28). However, after adjustment for pigmentation related variables in a multivariable MR framework, the BCC findings were attenuated. Here we report that lower 25(OH)D is unlikely to be a causal risk factor for most cancers, with our study providing more precise confidence intervals than previously possible. Studies of the genetic association between vitamin D and cancer risk have typically been underpowered. Here the authors analyse this using Mendelian Randomisation with more than 70 vitamin D variants obtained from the UK Biobank and large-scale data from various consortia, confirming null associations between vitamin D and most cancers.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2
作者:
Bowden J;Del Greco M F;Minelli C;Davey Smith G;Sheehan N;Thompson J
通讯作者:
Thompson J
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Bycroft C;Freeman C;Petkova D;Band G;Elliott LT;Sharp K;Motyer A;Vukcevic D;Delaneau O;O'Connell J;Cortes A;Welsh S;Young A;Effingham M;McVean G;Leslie S;Allen N;Donnelly P;Marchini J
通讯作者:
Marchini J
影响因子:
2.1
作者:
Bowden J;Davey Smith G;Haycock PC;Burgess S
通讯作者:
Burgess S
影响因子:
30.8
作者:
Bulik-Sullivan, Brendan K.;Loh, Po-Ru;Finucane, Hilary K.;Ripke, Stephan;Yang, Jian;Patterson, Nick;Daly, Mark J.;Price, Alkes L.;Neale, Benjamin M.
通讯作者:
Neale, Benjamin M.
影响因子:
3.5
作者:
Ahn J;Yu K;Stolzenberg-Solomon R;Simon KC;McCullough ML;Gallicchio L;Jacobs EJ;Ascherio A;Helzlsouer K;Jacobs KB;Li Q;Weinstein SJ;Purdue M;Virtamo J;Horst R;Wheeler W;Chanock S;Hunter DJ;Hayes RB;Kraft P;Albanes D
通讯作者:
Albanes D