Cashing out: The decisional flexibility of uncertainty responses in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).
Cashing out: The decisional flexibility of uncertainty responses in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and humans (Homo sapiens).
复制标题
DOI:
10.1037/xan0000041
复制
发表时间:
2014-10
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Smith JD
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Zakrzewski AC;Perdue BM;Beran MJ;Church BA;Smith JD
Researchers are exploring whether animals share with humans something like a metacognitive capacity. Though some results point to human-animal continuities in this domain, they face the dominant criticism that animals’ performances might be associative. A persistent problem is that animal-metacognition paradigms present static environments of risk and reward that may foster inflexible and conditioned responding. Those environments do not challenge animals to show the flexibility in their decision strategies that could indicate an antecedent capacity to metacognition. Accordingly, we tested macaques and humans on an uncertainty-monitoring paradigm in which risk changed dynamically. Participants classified stimuli of different difficulties while also choosing when to use a cashout response to collect the accumulated rewards that would be forfeit on a discrimination error. Macaques and humans flexibly adjusted their decision criteria to achieve appropriate protection against the cost of error that could differ depending on trial difficulty and the number of rewards at risk. In particular, monkeys widened their cashout-response region as their accumulated rewards increased, providing more protection against a more costly error. These findings demonstrate a new continuity between humans’ and animals’ uncertainty systems. They reveal a calibration by macaques of present risk to trial difficulty tolerated. They show that animals’ uncertainty-monitoring and risk-management systems have substantial trial-by-trial flexibility.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
2.6
作者:
Beran, Michael J.;Johnson-Pynn, Julie S.;Ready, Christopher
通讯作者:
Ready, Christopher
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
Daw, Nathaniel D.;O'Doherty, John P.;Dayan, Peter;Seymour, Ben;Dolan, Raymond J.
通讯作者:
Dolan, Raymond J.
影响因子:
3.4
作者:
Evans TA;Beran MJ
通讯作者:
Beran MJ
影响因子:
9.2
作者:
Foote, Allison L.;Crystal, Jonathon D.
通讯作者:
Crystal, Jonathon D.
影响因子:
3.7
作者:
Haun, Daniel B. M.;Nawroth, Christian;Call, Josep
通讯作者:
Call, Josep