Decreased Odds of Injection Risk Behavior Associated With Direct Versus Indirect Use of Syringe Exchange: Evidence From Two California Cities.
Decreased Odds of Injection Risk Behavior Associated With Direct Versus Indirect Use of Syringe Exchange: Evidence From Two California Cities.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1080/10826084.2017.1299182
复制
发表时间:
2017-07-29
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
Gibson DR
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Behrends CN;Li CS;Gibson DR
Background: While there is substantial evidence that syringe exchange programs (SEPs) are effective in preventing HIV among people who inject drugs (PWID), nearly all the evidence comes from PWID who obtain syringes from an SEP directly. Much less is known about the benefits of secondary exchange to PWID who get syringes indirectly from friends or acquaintances who visit an SEP for them.Objectives: We evaluated the effectiveness of direct versus indirect syringe exchange in reducing HIV-related high-risk injecting behavior among PWID in two separate studies conducted in Sacramento and San Jose, California, cities with quite different syringe exchange models.Methods: In both studies associations between direct and indirect syringe exchange and self-reported risk behavior were examined with multivariable logistic regression models. Study 1 assessed effects of a “satellite” home-delivery syringe exchange in Sacramento, while Study 2 evaluated a conventional fixed-site exchange in San Jose.Results: Multivariable analyses revealed 95% and 69% reductions, respectively, in high-risk injection associated with direct use of the SEPs in Sacramento and San Jose, and a 46% reduction associated with indirect use of the SEP in Sacramento.Conclusions/Importance: The very large effect of direct SEP use in Sacramento was likely due in part to home delivery of sterile syringes. While more modest effects were associated with indirect use, such use nevertheless is valuable in reducing the risk of HIV transmission of PWID who are unable or unwilling to visit a syringe exchange.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.4
作者:
Bryant, Joanne;Hopwood, Max
通讯作者:
Hopwood, Max
影响因子:
12.7
作者:
Gibson, David R.;Zhang, Guili;Kegeles, Susan M.
通讯作者:
Kegeles, Susan M.
影响因子:
2
作者:
Lenton, S;Bevan, J;Lamond, T
通讯作者:
Lamond, T
影响因子:
2
作者:
Lorvick, Jennifer;Bluthenthal, Ricky N.;Kral, Alex H.
通讯作者:
Kral, Alex H.
影响因子:
3.8
作者:
Liu, Bo;Sullivan, Sheena G.;Wu, Zunyou
通讯作者:
Wu, Zunyou