Human-Agent and Human-Robot Interaction Theory: Similarities to and Differences from Human-Human Interaction
Human-Agent and Human-Robot Interaction Theory: Similarities to and Differences from Human-Human Interaction
复制标题
人机交互理论和人机交互理论：人机交互的异同
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
影响因子：
5.3
通讯作者：
S. Eimler
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
N. Krämer;A. V. D. Pütten;S. Eimler
它将讨论是否需要一个专门针对人机和人机交互的理论，或者是否可以适应人机交互的理论。首先，将介绍人际互动的理论。然后，提出了人-机器人和人-代理交互的经验证据。研究表明，从用户的角度来看，与人工实体的交互类似于与人类同胞的交互。对这种以社会方式对待代理/机器人的解释（如ethopoeia方法，nass&moon, 2000）假设，由于我们的社会本性，人类在面对人工实体时也会使用他们的互动程序。在此基础上，我们将讨论人类互动的理论是否也会成为人类代理/机器人互动的有用框架，修正是否有益，或者是否需要一种全新的方法。
It will be discussed whether a theory specific for human-robot and human-agent interaction is needed or whether theories from human-human interactions can be adapted. First, theories from human-human interaction will be presented. Then, empirical evidence from human-robot- and human-agent interaction is presented. Research suggests that, from the perspective of the user, interaction with an artificial entity is similar to interaction with fellow humans. Explanations for this treatment of agents/robots in a social way (such as the ethopoeia approach, Nass& Moon, 2000) assume that due to our social nature humans will use their interaction routines also when confronted with artificial entities. Based on this it will be discussed whether theories from human-human-interaction will be a helpful framework also for human-agent/robot interaction, whether amendments will be beneficial or whether, alternatively, a totally new approach is needed.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
DECI, EL;RYAN, RM
通讯作者：
RYAN, RM
DOI：
10.1002/cd.35
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
New directions for child and adolescent development.
影响因子：
--
作者：
Laursen,Brett;Hartup,WillardW
通讯作者：
Hartup,WillardW
影响因子：
22.4
作者：
Lillard, A
通讯作者：
Lillard, A