Barriers and facilitators to the integration of mental health services into primary health care: a systematic review protocol.
Barriers and facilitators to the integration of mental health services into primary health care: a systematic review protocol.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s13643-017-0561-0
复制
发表时间：
2017-08-25
影响因子：
3.7
通讯作者：
Talib ZM
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wakida EK;Akena D;Okello ES;Kinengyere A;Kamoga R;Mindra A;Obua C;Talib ZM
Mental health is an integral part of health and well-being and yet health systems have not adequately responded to the burden of mental disorders. Integrating mental health services into primary health care (PHC) is the most viable way of closing the treatment gap and ensuring that people get the mental health care they need. PHC was formally adapted by the World Health Organization (WHO), and they have since invested enormous amounts of resources across the globe to ensure that integration of mental health services into PHC works. This review will use the SPIDER (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type) framework approach to identify experiences of mental health integration into PHC; the findings will be reported using the “Best fit” framework synthesis. PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled trials (CENTRAL) will be searched including other sources like the WHO website and OpenGrey database. Assessment of bias and quality will be done at study level using two separate tools to check for the quality of evidence presented. Data synthesis will take on two synergistic approaches (qualitative and quantitative studies). Synthesizing evidence from countries across the globe will provide useful insights into the experiences of integrating mental health services into PHC and how the barriers and challenges have been handled. The findings will be useful to a wide array of stakeholders involved in the implementation of the mental health integration into PHC. The SPIDER framework has been chosen for this review because of its suitable application to qualitative and mixed methods research and will be used as a guide when selecting articles for inclusion. Data extracted will be synthesized using the “Best fit” framework because it has been used before and proved its suitability in producing new conceptual models for explaining decision-making and possible behaviors. Synthesizing evidence from countries across the globe will provide useful insights into the experiences of integrating mental health services into PHC and how the barriers and challenges have been handled. PROSPERO CRD42016052000 The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13643-017-0561-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1136/bmj.b2535
发表时间：
2009-07-21
期刊：
BMJ (Clinical research ed.)
影响因子：
--
作者：
Moher D;Liberati A;Tetzlaff J;Altman DG;PRISMA Group
通讯作者：
PRISMA Group
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Cooke, Alison;Smith, Debbie;Booth, Andrew
通讯作者：
Booth, Andrew
影响因子：
168.9
作者：
Kakuma, Ritsuko;Minas, Harry;Scheffler, Richard M.
通讯作者：
Scheffler, Richard M.
影响因子：
4
作者：
Gale NK;Heath G;Cameron E;Rashid S;Redwood S
通讯作者：
Redwood S
影响因子：
168.9
作者：
Saraceno, Benedetto;van Ommeren, Mark;Underhill, Chris
通讯作者：
Underhill, Chris