Predictors of dyadic planning: Perspectives of prostate cancer survivors and their partners
Predictors of dyadic planning: Perspectives of prostate cancer survivors and their partners
复制标题
二元规划的预测因素:前列腺癌幸存者及其伴侣的观点
DOI:
10.1111/bjhp.12216
复制
发表时间:
--
影响因子:
7.9
通讯作者:
Schrader
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Keller;Wiedemann;Scholz;U. Burkert;Schrader
ObjectivesExtending individual planning of health behaviour change to the level of the dyad, dyadic planning refers to a target person and a planning partner jointly planning the target person's health behaviour change. To date, predictors of dyadic planning have not been systematically investigated. Integrating cognitive predictors of individual planning with four established predictor domains of social support provision, we propose a framework of predictors of dyadic planning. Including target persons’ and partners’ perspectives, we examine these predictor domains in the context of prostate cancer patients’ rehabilitative pelvic floor exercise (PFE) following radical prostatectomy.DesignLongitudinal data from 175 patients and their partners were analysed in a study with four post‐surgery assessments across 6 months.MethodsPFE‐related dyadic planning was assessed from both partners together with indicators from four predictor domains: context, target person, partner, and relationship factors. Individual planning and social support served as covariates.ResultsFindings from two‐level models nesting repeated assessments in individuals showed that context (patients’ incontinence), target person (i.e., positive affect and self‐efficacy), and relationship factors (i.e., relationship satisfaction) were uniquely associated with dyadic planning, whereas partner factors (i.e., positive and negative affects) were not. Factors predicting patients’ and partners’ accounts of dyadic planning differed.ConclusionsResembling prior findings on antecedents of support provision in this context, partner factors did not prevail as unique predictors of dyadic planning, whereas indicators from all other predictor domains did. To establish predictive direction, future work should use lagged predictions with shorter intermeasurement intervals.Statement of contributionWhat is already known on this subject?Dyadic planning has been shown to be linked to health behaviour change. However, its role in behaviour regulation frameworks is not well investigated, especially regarding factors that might be predictive of dyadic planning.What does this study add?A framework of predictors of dyadic planning in the health behaviour change process is presented.The framework is investigated accounting for both planning partners’ perspectives.Context, target person, and relationship factors were related to dyadic planning.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1056/nejmoa1209978
发表时间:
2013-01-31
期刊:
The New England journal of medicine
影响因子:
--
作者:
Resnick MJ;Koyama T;Fan KH;Albertsen PC;Goodman M;Hamilton AS;Hoffman RM;Potosky AL;Stanford JL;Stroup AM;Van Horn RL;Penson DF
通讯作者:
Penson DF
影响因子:
1.8
作者:
Karantanis, E;Fynes, M;Stanton, SL
通讯作者:
Stanton, SL
影响因子:
6.9
作者:
Benyamini, Yael;Ashery, Limor;Shiloh, Shoshana
通讯作者:
Shiloh, Shoshana
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2012
期刊:
Journal of human nutrition and dietetics (Print)
影响因子:
--
作者:
L. V. Genugten;P. Empelen;A. Oenema
通讯作者:
A. Oenema
DOI:
10.1111/aphw.12043
发表时间:
2015
期刊:
Applied psychology. Health and well-being
影响因子:
--
作者:
Wiedemann;Schrader;Felber;Burkert;Heckhausen
通讯作者:
Heckhausen