Assessing the readability of the self-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.

Assessing the readability of the self-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1192/bjo.2017.13
复制
发表时间:
2018-03
期刊:
影响因子:
5.4
通讯作者:
Wolpert M
Wolpert M
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Patalay P;Hayes D;Wolpert M

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

优势和困难问卷(SDQ)是临床实践、社区筛查和研究中最广泛使用的儿童和青少年心理健康指标之一。评估这种问卷的可读性很重要,因为年轻人在自我报告时可能无法理解超出其阅读能力的项目。本研究中的可读性分析表明,自我报告SDQ可能不适合年龄在13-14岁以下的年轻人阅读,并强调子量表之间的可读性差异。研究结果表明,在使用SDQ作为13岁以下儿童的自我报告措施时需要谨慎,并强调在措施制定,选择和解释的可读性方面的考虑。没有。
The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is one of the most widely used measures in child and adolescent mental health in clinical practice, community-based screening and research. Assessing the readability of such questionnaires is important as young people may not comprehend items above their reading ability when self-reporting. Analyses of readability in the present study indicate that the self-report SDQ might not be suitable for young people with a reading age below 13–14 years and highlight differences in readability between subscales. The findings suggest a need for caution in using the SDQ as a self-report measure for children below the age of 13, and highlight considerations of readability in measure development, selection and interpretation. None.
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.01.023
发表时间: 2015-05-01
影响因子: 7.6
作者:
Fink, Elian;Patalay, Praveetha;Wolpert, Miranda
通讯作者: Wolpert, Miranda
DOI: 10.1111/bjc.12025
发表时间: 2014-03-01
影响因子: 3.1
作者:
Curvis, Will;McNulty, Susannah;Qualter, Pamela
通讯作者: Qualter, Pamela
DOI: 10.1002/da.20827
发表时间: 2011-07-01
影响因子: 7.4
作者:
McHugh, R. Kathryn;Rasmussen, Jessica L.;Otto, Michael W.
通讯作者: Otto, Michael W.
DOI: 10.1007/s10862-015-9507-9
发表时间: 2016-06-01
影响因子: 1.6
作者:
Patalay, Praveetha;Hayes, Daniel;Wolpert, Miranda
通讯作者: Wolpert, Miranda
DOI: 10.1007/s007870050057
发表时间: 1998-09-01
影响因子: 6.4
作者:
Goodman, R;Meltzer, H;Bailey, V
通讯作者: Bailey, V