Does talking matter? A quasi-experiment assessing the impact of deliberation and information on opinion change
Does talking matter? A quasi-experiment assessing the impact of deliberation and information on opinion change
复制标题
说话重要吗？
DOI：
10.1177/0192512118824459
复制
发表时间：
2020
影响因子：
2.2
通讯作者：
Jane Suiter
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. O’Malley;D. Farrell;Jane Suiter
对许多人来说，协商民主是过去50年来民主理论最重大的发展，它已经在一些地方被用来解决现实世界的政策问题。然而，衡量深思熟虑的方法的影响并不是明确的，因为几个独立变量同时被操纵。深思熟虑的主要目的之一是改变意见，因此理解意见改变的原因是很重要的。本文利用比较组来隔离审议过程中审议的影响和信息。我们概述了一个准实验的结果，在这个实验中，爱尔兰的一个公民大会(CA)进行了审议。作为这项研究的一部分，我们使用测试前和测试后的控制措施来衡量影响，包括一组给出CA参与者收到的信息，但没有经过深思熟虑的小组。分析结果提供了单独审议效应的证据。
Deliberative democracy is for many the most significant development in democratic theory in the last 50 years and it has been used in some places to solve real-world policy problems. However, measuring the impact of deliberative methods is not clearly achievable because several independent variables are manipulated simultaneously. One of the main goals of deliberation is opinion change and thus it is important to understand why opinions change. This paper utilises comparison groups in order to isolate the impact of deliberation from information in the deliberative process. We outline the results of a quasi-experiment in which deliberation took place in a citizens’ assembly (CA) in Ireland. As part of this we measured the impact using pre- and post-test controls, including a group given the information the CA participants received, but without the deliberation. The results of the analysis provide evidence of a separate deliberation effect.
减少群体间偏见：群体间合作的要素。
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Gaertner,SL;Dovidio,JF;Rust,MC;Nier,JA;Banker,BS;Ward,CM;Mottola,GR;Houlette,M
通讯作者：
Houlette,M