The Political Is Personal
The Political Is Personal
复制标题
政治是个人的
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2012
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Grabe
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
N. Else;S. Grabe
与“个人即政治”的格言相一致，女权主义学者坚持认为，安全、受教育机会、经济机会和财产所有权方面的性别平等是妇女福祉的核心。评估本论文的实证研究可以包括国家一级的性别平等指标，如联合国开发计划署的性别权力衡量。然而，尽管这些措施越来越受欢迎，但很少讨论如何适当衡量两性平等或在心理学理论基础的实证研究中适当应用这些工具。此外，纳入这些指标的大部分心理学研究并没有采用女权主义或解放框架。作者总结和评估国家一级的性别平等指标，以熟悉现有的工具，研究人员和作者审查了有限的心理学文献，使用这些指标。作者还讨论了心理学研究如何更好地利用经验模型中的性别平等指标来研究与妇女福祉有关的政治进程。
Consistent with the dictum, “the personal is political,” feminist scholars have maintained that gender equity in security, access to education, economic opportunity, and property ownership are central to women’s well-being. Empirical research evaluating this thesis can include nation-level indicators of gender equity, such as the United Nation Development Program’s Gender Empowerment Measure. Yet, despite the growing popularity of such measures, there has been little discussion of the adequate measurement of gender equity or the appropriate application of such tools in theory-grounded empirical research within psychology. Moreover, the bulk of psychological research that has integrated such indicators has not employed a feminist or emancipatory framework. The authors summarize and evaluate nation-level gender equity indicators in order to familiarize researchers with the available tools, and the authors review the limited psychological literature that has used these indicators. The authors also discuss how psychological research can better use gender equity indicators in empirical models to examine political processes linked to women’s well-being.
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
Costa, PT;Terracciano, A;McCrae, RR
通讯作者：
McCrae, RR