Shades of green and REDD: Local and global contestations over the value of forest versus plantation development on the Indonesian forest frontier
Shades of green and REDD: Local and global contestations over the value of forest versus plantation development on the Indonesian forest frontier
复制标题
绿色和REDD的色调：当地和全球对印度尼西亚森林边境森林价值与人工林开发的争论
DOI：
10.1111/apv.12084
复制
发表时间：
2015
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Michael F. Eilenberg
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Michael F. Eilenberg
在大规模的环保举措和农业扩张引发的土地圈地增加的时候，本文探讨了当地和全球对印度尼西亚森林边境森林价值的评估。参与最近关于碳林业的辩论，该文件problematises的新兴举措的“减少毁林和森林退化的排放量”，称为REDD+在印度尼西亚西加里曼丹省。该文件认为，普遍急于实施REDD+没有深入了解资源争夺的政治格局，有可能产生新的圈地的危险，可能很容易被当地精英占用，从而排除当地社会的不幸部分。该文件显示了对REDD+的不同解释是如何引发土地纠纷的，以及强大的行为者如何随时将REDD+话语作为支持不同土地所有权主张的工具。政府和村民通过重叠和相互矛盾的参与，与全球环境行为体和私营种植园公司谈判REDD+倡议。本文件强调了这些地方现实对REDD+成功的影响。加里曼丹案例凸显了整个东南亚前沿地区碳减排举措所面临的一些困境，这些地区已成为大规模气候变化举措和农业扩张的主要战场。
In a time of increasing land enclosures sparked by large-scale environmental initiatives and agricultural expansion, this paper examines local and global contestations over the value of forest on an Indonesian forest frontier. Engaging with recent debates on carbon forestry, the paper problematises the emerging initiatives of ‘Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation’ known as REDD+ in the province of West Kalimantan, Indonesia. The paper argues that the general rush to implement REDD+ without intimate knowledge of the political landscape of resource struggle is in danger of generating new enclosures of land that may be easily appropriated by local elites, thus excluding less fortunate sections of local society. The paper shows how divergent interpretations of REDD+ are triggering land disputes, and how powerful actors readily appropriate REDD+ discourses as a tool to support divergent claims of land ownership. Government and villagers, through overlapping and contradictory engagements, negotiate REDD+ initiatives with global environmental actors and private plantation companies. The paper highlights the implications of these local realities for the successes of REDD+. The Kalimantan case highlights some of the dilemmas of carbon mitigation initiatives experienced in frontier regions throughout Southeast Asia, places that have become prime battlefronts of large-scale climate change initiatives and agrarian expansion.
“自由、事先和知情同意”（FPIC）如何影响社会公平？
影响因子：
7.1
作者：
Mahanty S
通讯作者：
Mahanty S