The Bem Sex-Role Inventory
The Bem Sex-Role Inventory
复制标题
Bem 性别角色调查表
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Jody L. Newman
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Namok Choi;D. Fuqua;Jody L. Newman
Pedhazur和Tetenbaum推测，Bem性别角色量表（BSRI）人格特质自我评级的因素结构与相同特质的愿望评级的因素结构不同。为了探讨这一假设，两个愿望评级的BSRI特质（男性和女性）和自我评级从相同的样本和因素分析。对40个BSRI特征的三组评级（自我评级，男性的可取性评级和女性的可取性评级）进行的因素分析证实，评级的因素是多样的。因此，必须独立研究基本结构。预测判别分析复制的发现，两个特征（男性和女性）提供了几乎所有的歧视，男性和女性的样本时，自我评级。此外，预测判别分析显示，参与者的性别组的分类是非常准确的使用自我评级，但显着恶化时，使用的可取性评级。
Pedhazur and Tetenbaum speculated that factor structures from self-ratings of the Bem Sex-Role Inventory (BSRI) personality traits would be different from factor structures from desirability ratings of the same traits. To explore this hypothesis, both desirability ratings of BSRI traits (both for a man and for a woman) and self-ratings were obtained from the same sample and factor analyzed. Factor analyses performed on the three sets of ratings of the 40 BSRI traits (self-ratings, desirability ratings for a man, and desirability ratings for a woman) confirmed that the factors across ratings were diverse. Thus, the underlying constructs must be studied independently. Predictive discriminant analyses replicated the finding that two traits alone (Masculine and Feminine) provided nearly all of the discrimination of males and females in the sample when self-ratings were employed. Also, predictive discriminant analyses revealed that the classification of participants into gender groups was very accurate using self-ratings but deteriorated remarkably when using the desirability ratings.
影响因子：
5.4
作者：
JUDD, CM;PARK, B
通讯作者：
PARK, B