Renewed calls for abortion-related research in the post-Roe era.
Renewed calls for abortion-related research in the post-Roe era.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3389/fpubh.2023.1322299
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
5.2
通讯作者：
Fletcher, Faith E.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Schott, Sophie L.;Adams, April;Dougherty, Ryan J.;Montgomery, Taylor;Lapite, Folasade C.;Fletcher, Faith E.
在罗伊诉韦德案近50年后，美国最高法院在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案中作出的裁决，打破了堕胎的宪法权利，允许各州严格限制或禁止堕胎。作为回应，主要的医疗、公共卫生和社区组织再次呼吁进行研究，以阐明和解决新的堕胎限制带来的日益严重的社会和医疗后果。堕胎研究不仅包括建立以证据为基础的堕胎护理方案的安全性、质量和有效性的研究，还包括对堕胎护理的可获得性、被拒绝堕胎的后果以及围绕堕胎的法律和社会负担的研究。这些对新证据的迫切呼吁强调了确保以合乎道德和尊重的方式开展这一领域的研究的重要性，认识到形成生殖健康不平等并影响从方案设计到结果传播的研究的每个阶段的社会、政治和结构条件。研究伦理涉及研究项目设计和执行的道德原则，涉及与研究过程相关的伦理问题的技术细节，如知情同意、权力关系和保密。来自生殖正义、社区参与和应用伦理框架的批判性见解和反思，通过强调与社区利益相关者进行有意义的接触的重要性，加强了现有的研究伦理学术和话语——关注压迫的重叠结构，包括种族主义、性别歧视，以及这些结构在研究过程中延续的方式。
Nearly 50 years after Roe versus Wade, the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs versus Jackson Women’s Health Organization unraveled the constitutional right to abortion, allowing individual states to severely restrict or ban the procedure. In response, leading medical, public health, and community organizations have renewed calls for research to elucidate and address the burgeoning social and medical consequences of new abortion restrictions. Abortion research not only includes studies that establish the safety, quality, and efficacy of evidence-based abortion care protocols, but also encompasses studies on the availability of abortion care, the consequences of being denied an abortion, and the legal and social burdens surrounding abortion. The urgency of these calls for new evidence underscores the importance of ensuring that research in this area is conducted in an ethical and respectful manner, cognizant of the social, political, and structural conditions that shape reproductive health inequities and impact each stage of research—from protocol design to dissemination of findings. Research ethics relates to the moral principles undergirding the design and execution of research projects, and concerns itself with the technicalities of ethical questions related to the research process, such as informed consent, power relations, and confidentiality. Critical insights and reflections from reproductive justice, community engagement, and applied ethics frameworks have bolstered existing research ethics scholarship and discourse by underscoring the importance of meaningful engagement with community stakeholders—bringing attention to overlapping structures of oppression, including racism, sexism, and ways that these structures are perpetuated in the research process.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1525/jer.2014.9.1.1
发表时间：
2014-02-01
影响因子：
1.3
作者：
Fisher, Celia B.
通讯作者：
Fisher, Celia B.
影响因子：
13.4
作者：
Waggoner, Miranda R.;Lyerly, Anne Drapkin
通讯作者：
Lyerly, Anne Drapkin
影响因子：
9.8
作者：
D'Alton, Mary E.;Friedman, Alexander M.;Foley, Michael R.
通讯作者：
Foley, Michael R.
DOI：
10.1097/acm.0000000000001294
发表时间：
2017-03
期刊：
Academic medicine : journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges
影响因子：
--
作者：
Bourgois P;Holmes SM;Sue K;Quesada J
通讯作者：
Quesada J
影响因子：
--
作者：
Childerhose, Janet E;Finnila, Candice R;Brothers, Kyle B
通讯作者：
Brothers, Kyle B