The Effects of Articulatory Suppression on Reading Ideographic and Alphabetic Numbers

The Effects of Articulatory Suppression on Reading Ideographic and Alphabetic Numbers
复制标题

发音抑制对阅读表意文字和字母数字的影响

DOI:
10.1080/14640748108400779
复制
发表时间:
2018
期刊:
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Hulme C
Hulme C
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hulme C

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本实验研究了发音抑制对阅读数字的影响。或阿拉伯数字(1、2等)。对于字母数字,而不是数字,可以生成语音表示并用于词汇访问。如果这样的语音编码发生了,并且它被不相关的发音活动所损害,那么发音抑制对字母的阅读的影响应该比对数字的数字表示的影响更大。与Baron(1977)报道的关于字母数字和罗马数字的研究结果相反,在两个实验中发现,抑制对两种类型数字的阅读具有基本相同的影响。第三个实验探讨了这些不一致发现的可能解释。它的结论是,虽然字母和数字表示的数字可能会被不同的处理有没有证据支持的想法,阅读字母数字涉及语音编码之前的词汇访问。
The present experiments investigated the effects of articulatory suppression on reading numbers written alphabetically (one, two, etc.) or as Arabic numerals (1, 2, etc.). For alphabetic numbers, but not for numerals, a phonological representation can be generated and used for lexical access. If such phonological encoding occurs, and if it is harmed by irrelevant articulatory activity, then articulatory suppression should have a greater effect on the reading of alphabetic than on numeral representations of numbers. In contrast to a finding reported by Baron (1977), involving alphabetic and Roman numerals, in two experiments suppression was found to have essentially equivalent effects on the reading of both types of numbers. A third experiment explored a possible explanation for these discrepant findings. It is concluded that although alphabetic and numeral representations of numbers may be processed differently there is no evidence to support the idea that reading alphabetic numbers involves phonological encoding prior to lexical access.
阅读不需要音素阶段
DOI: 10.1080/14640747308400343
发表时间: 1973
影响因子: 1.7
作者:
J. Baron
通讯作者: J. Baron
DOI: 10.2307/1128657
发表时间: 1977-01-01
期刊: CHILD DEVELOPMENT
影响因子: 4.6
作者:
BARRON, RW;BARON, J
通讯作者: BARON, J