A comparison of iterative algorithms and a mixed approach for in-line x-ray phase retrieval.

A comparison of iterative algorithms and a mixed approach for in-line x-ray phase retrieval.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.optcom.2009.05.027
复制
发表时间:
2009-08-15
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Liu, Hong
Liu, Hong
中科院分区:
物理与天体物理3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Meng, Fanbo;Zhang, Da;Wu, Xizeng;Liu, Hong

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

Previous studies have shown that iterative in-line x-ray phase retrieval algorithms may have higher precision than direct retrieval algorithms. This communication compares three iterative phase retrieval algorithms in terms of accuracy and efficiency using computer simulations. We found the Fourier transformation based algorithm (FT) is of the fastest convergence, while the Poisson-solver based algorithm (PS) has higher precision. The traditional Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm (GS) is very slow and sometimes does not converge in our tests. Then a mixed FT-PS algorithm is presented to achieve both high efficiency and high accuracy. The mixed algorithm is tested using simulated images with different noise level and experimentally obtained images of a piece of chicken breast muscle.
DOI: 10.1078/0030-4026-00336
发表时间: 2004-01-01
期刊: OPTIK
影响因子: 3.1
作者:
Zhang, Y;Pedrini, G;Tiziani, HJ
通讯作者: Tiziani, HJ
DOI: 10.1364/josa.58.001235
发表时间: 1968-01-01
影响因子: --
作者:
LALOR, E
通讯作者: LALOR, E
DOI: 10.1364/ol.30.001638
发表时间: 2005-07-01
期刊: OPTICS LETTERS
影响因子: 3.6
作者:
Quiney, HM;Nugent, KA;Peele, AG
通讯作者: Peele, AG
DOI: 10.1063/1.2403783
发表时间: 2007-01-01
影响因子: 1.6
作者:
Marchesini, S.
通讯作者: Marchesini, S.
DOI: 10.1007/s10851-007-0652-y
发表时间: 2007-04-01
影响因子: 2
作者:
Le, Triet;Chartrand, Rick;Asaki, Thomas J.
通讯作者: Asaki, Thomas J.