How do social network sites support product users' knowledge construction? A study of LinkedIn

How do social network sites support product users' knowledge construction? A study of LinkedIn
复制标题

社交网站如何支持产品用户的知识建构?

DOI:
10.1108/oir-04-2017-0133
复制
发表时间:
2018-06
影响因子:
3.1
通讯作者:
Wang Zefeng
Wang Zefeng
中科院分区:
管理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Li Xuguang;Cox Andrew;Wang Zefeng

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

目的
Purpose Social network sites are emerging as a popular communication tool for knowledge sharing and construction. LinkedIn, which concentrates on professional networking, is reported to generate great informational benefits to its users. The purpose of this paper is to explore product users’ knowledge construction in solving technical problems on LinkedIn, which was chosen as a case example. Design/methodology/approach Discussion threads with rich knowledge elements were selected from an interest group about solving technical problems with laptops. Adopting a qualitative content analysis method, selected threads were analysed with a prior analysis framework built in the context of traditional IT company sponsored peer user support forums. Findings The analysis revealed that the iterative and progressive knowledge construction process and associated trial-and-error strategy used on LinkedIn are similar to those found in peer support forums. However, LinkedIn members are more engaged in knowledge construction episodes. Meanwhile, the sub-category “proposing a new idea” accounts for a larger portion of discussions reflecting the high-level of expertise. One-to-one direct interaction is quite salient. Therefore, LinkedIn can support knowledge construction in a more efficient way due to the character of its social capital, including trust, sense of belonging, norms of cooperation, visible identity, knowledge articulation skills, one-to-one direct interaction and suitable strength of ties. Originality/value This research is novel in empirically revealing how LinkedIn attributes and its social capital attributes interact with each other and together facilitate an efficient knowledge construction process.
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2654350
发表时间: 2015-05
影响因子: --
作者:
U. Bretschneider;J. Leimeister;L. Mathiassen
通讯作者: U. Bretschneider;J. Leimeister;L. Mathiassen
DOI: 10.1177/1049732305276687
发表时间: 2005-11-01
影响因子: 3.2
作者:
Hsieh, HF;Shannon, SE
通讯作者: Shannon, SE
DOI: 10.1002/smj.679
发表时间: 2008-06
影响因子: 1.1
作者:
Balaji R. Koka;J. Prescott
通讯作者: Balaji R. Koka;J. Prescott
DOI: 10.1038/nn1002-917
发表时间: 2002
影响因子: 25
作者:
Carl Schmitt
通讯作者: Carl Schmitt
DOI: 10.5465/amr.2006.21318923
发表时间: 2006-07-01
影响因子: 16.4
作者:
Dhanaraj, Charles;Parkhe, Arvind
通讯作者: Parkhe, Arvind