Age- and muscle-specific reliability of muscle architecture measurements assessed by two-dimensional panoramic ultrasound.

Age- and muscle-specific reliability of muscle architecture measurements assessed by two-dimensional panoramic ultrasound.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1186/s12938-021-00967-4
复制
发表时间:
2022-02-13
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Murgia A
Murgia A
中科院分区:
工程技术3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hagoort I;Hortobágyi T;Vuillerme N;Lamoth CJC;Murgia A

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

肌肉特性中的肌肉相关变化影响日常功能,因此需要对这些特性进行可靠的评估。我们研究了年龄对腓肠肌内侧肌(GM)、胫骨前肌(TA)和股外侧肌(VL)的可靠性、肌肉质量和肌肉结构(MA)参数之间的相互关系的影响。三名评分员对12名健康的年轻人和老年人的超声(US)扫描进行评分,包括肌束长度(FL)、羽状角(PA)和肌肉厚度(MT)。采用组内相关系数(ICC)和测量值的标准误(SEM,SEM%)评估静息和收缩时MA测量值的评定者内和评定者间信度,采用Pearson相关系数分析MA参数之间的关系。肌肉质量(MQ)检查使用平均像素强度。两组TA的可靠性为中度至极佳(ICC:0.64-0.99,SEM% = 1.6-14.8%),年轻组VL的可靠性为中度至极佳(ICC:0.67-0.98,SEM% = 2.0-18.3%)。老年人的VL可靠性较差至极好(ICC:0.22-0.99,SEM% = 2.7-36.0%)。对于GM,两组的ICC均为良好至极好(ICC:0.76-0.99),但老年人的GM SEM%较高(年轻人的SEM%= 1.5- 10.7%,老年人的SEM%= 1.6-28.1%)。老年人的肌肉质量平均比年轻人低19.0%。在两组中,发现VL FL和MT(r ≥ 0.54)、TA PA和MT(r ≥ 0.72)存在中度至强相关性,而TA FL仅在年轻人中与MT相关(r ≥ 0.67)。总之,年龄和肌肉特异性存在于MT和PA之间的关系,MT和FL在休息。此外,2D全景US评估MA参数的可靠性是可以接受的。然而,可靠性水平随年龄、肌肉和MA测量而变化。值得注意的是,在老年人中,VL肌肉的可靠性最低。在MA参数中,MT似乎是所有肌肉和年龄组中最简单且最容易再现的参数。在线版本包含补充材料,可通过10.1186/s12938-021-00967-4获得。
Age-related changes in muscle properties affect daily functioning, therefore a reliable assessment of such properties is required. We examined the effects of age on reliability, muscle quality and interrelation among muscle architecture (MA) parameters of the gastrocnemius medialis (GM), tibialis anterior (TA), and vastus lateralis (VL) muscles. Three raters scored ultrasound (US) scans of 12 healthy younger and older adults, on fascicle length (FL), pennation angle (PA) and muscle thickness (MT). Intra- and inter-rater reliability of MA measures in rest and contraction was assessed by intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and standard error of measurements (SEM, SEM%). The relationship between MA parameters was examined using Pearson correlation coefficients. Muscle quality (MQ) was examined using mean pixel intensity. Reliability was moderate to excellent for TA in both groups (ICCs: 0.64–0.99, SEM% = 1.6–14.8%), and for VL in the younger group (ICCs: 0.67–0.98, SEM% = 2.0–18.3%). VL reliability was poor to excellent in older adults (ICCs: 0.22–0.99, SEM% = 2.7–36.0%). For GM, ICCs were good to excellent (ICCs: 0.76–0.99) in both groups, but GM SEM% were higher in older adults (SEM%Younger = 1.5–10.7%, SEM%Older = 1.6–28.1%). Muscle quality was on average 19.0% lower in older vs. younger adults. In both groups, moderate to strong correlations were found for VL FL and MT (r ≥ 0.54), and TA PA and MT (r ≥ 0.72), while TA FL correlated with MT (r ≥ 0.67) in younger adults only. In conclusion, age- and muscle-specificities were present in the relationships between MT and PA, and MT and FL at rest. Furthermore, the reliability of MA parameters assessed with 2D panoramic US is acceptable. However, the level of reliability varies with age, muscle and MA measure. In older adults notably, the lowest reliability was observed in the VL muscle. Among the MA parameters, MT appears to be the simplest and most easily reproducible parameter in all muscles and age groups. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12938-021-00967-4.
DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199807000-00007
发表时间: 1998-07-01
期刊: MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE
影响因子: --
作者:
Abe, T;Brechue, WF;Brown, JB
通讯作者: Brown, JB
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051920106
发表时间: 1987-04-01
影响因子: 1.5
作者:
GANS, C;DEVREE, F
通讯作者: DEVREE, F
DOI: 10.1080/15598608.2011.10483734
发表时间: 2011-01-01
影响因子: 0.6
作者:
Kowalik, Danuta;Choi, Yun-Hee;Zou, G. Y.
通讯作者: Zou, G. Y.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008369
发表时间: 2021-06
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Afschrift M;De Groote F;Jonkers I
通讯作者: Jonkers I
DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afq034
发表时间: 2010-07
期刊: Age and ageing
影响因子: 6.7
作者:
Cruz-Jentoft AJ;Baeyens JP;Bauer JM;Boirie Y;Cederholm T;Landi F;Martin FC;Michel JP;Rolland Y;Schneider SM;Topinková E;Vandewoude M;Zamboni M;European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People
通讯作者: European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People