Neo-darwinism still haunts evolutionary theory: A modern perspective on Charlesworth, Lande, and Slatkin (1982).
Neo-darwinism still haunts evolutionary theory: A modern perspective on Charlesworth, Lande, and Slatkin (1982).
复制标题
Neo-Darwinism still haunts evolutionary theory：A modern perspective on Charlesworth，Lande，and Slatkin（1982）.
DOI：
10.1111/evo.14268
复制
发表时间：
2021-06
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Bradburd GS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Hancock ZB;Lehmberg ES;Bradburd GS
现代综合主义（或“新达尔文主义”）产生于达尔文的自然选择理论和孟德尔的遗传学研究的协调，仍然是进化论的基础。然而，自成立以来，它一直受到批评，从轻微的狡辩到彻底的驳斥。最著名的批评家是史蒂芬·杰·古尔德 (Stephen Jay Gould)，他在 1980 年宣称现代综合“实际上已经死亡”。古尔德和其他人声称，自然选择对随机突变的作用本身不足以解释宏观进化多样性和分歧的模式，需要新的过程来解释化石记录的发现。 1982年，查尔斯沃斯、兰德和斯拉特金在《进化论》上发表了对这一批评的回应，他们认为新达尔文主义确实足以解释宏观进化模式。在进化研究学会成立 75 周年的这篇展望中，我们回顾了 Charlesworth 等人。并为他们的论点提供现代支持。我们强调微观进化过程在宏观进化模式研究中的重要性。最终，我们得出的结论是，间断平衡并不代表进化生物学的重大革命——尽管关于这一点的争论刺激了重要的研究并推动了该领域的发展——而且新达尔文主义仍然存在并且很好。
The Modern Synthesis (or “Neo-Darwinism”), which arose out of the reconciliation of Darwin’s theory of natural selection and Mendel’s research on genetics, remains the foundation of evolutionary theory. However, since its inception, it has been a lightning rod for criticism, which has ranged from minor quibbles to complete dismissal. Among the most famous of the critics was Stephen Jay Gould, who, in 1980, proclaimed that the Modern Synthesis was “effectively dead.” Gould and others claimed that the action of natural selection on random mutations was insufficient on its own to explain patterns of macroevolutionary diversity and divergence, and that new processes were required to explain findings from the fossil record. In 1982, Charlesworth, Lande, and Slatkin published a response to this critique in Evolution, in which they argued that Neo-Darwinism was indeed sufficient to explain macroevolutionary patterns. In this Perspective for the 75th Anniversary of the Society for the Study of Evolution, we review Charlesworth et al. in its historical context and provide modern support for their arguments. We emphasize the importance of microevolutionary processes in the study of macroevolutionary patterns. Ultimately, we conclude that punctuated equilibrium did not represent a major revolution in evolutionary biology – although debate on this point stimulated significant research and furthered the field – and that Neo-Darwinism is alive and well.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1111/evo.12329
发表时间：
2014-04
期刊：
Evolution; international journal of organic evolution
影响因子：
--
作者：
Butlin RK;Saura M;Charrier G;Jackson B;André C;Caballero A;Coyne JA;Galindo J;Grahame JW;Hollander J;Kemppainen P;Martínez-Fernández M;Panova M;Quesada H;Johannesson K;Rolán-Alvarez E
通讯作者：
Rolán-Alvarez E
DOI：
10.1073/pnas.1505357112
发表时间：
2015-10-27
影响因子：
11.1
作者：
Bolstad, Geir H.;Cassara, Jason A.;Pelabon, Christophe
通讯作者：
Pelabon, Christophe
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Degnan JH;Rosenberg NA
通讯作者：
Rosenberg NA
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
DAYAN, T;SIMBERLOFF, D;YOMTOV, Y
通讯作者：
YOMTOV, Y
影响因子：
2.9
作者：
Erwin, DH
通讯作者：
Erwin, DH