EU enlargement and differentiated integration: discrimination or equal treatment?

EU enlargement and differentiated integration: discrimination or equal treatment?
复制标题

欧盟东扩和差异化一体化:歧视还是平等待遇?

DOI:
10.1080/13501763.2014.897744
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Schimmelfennig
Schimmelfennig
中科院分区:
管理学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Schimmelfennig

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

欧盟东扩对差异化一体化有何影响?它是由新老成员国的相对议价能力驱动的,还是由实力较弱的候选人的平等甚至优惠待遇推动的?本文分析了欧盟六轮东扩在欧盟条约和次要法律方面的差异。它表明,给予新成员国特权的豁免差异比歧视性差异更频繁。虽然有一些证据表明,较贫穷的新成员国遭受歧视的程度更高,但新成员国之间的差异大部分是由扩大回合之间的差异解释的。此外,欧盟还给予较穷的申请者更多时间,让他们完全采用欧盟的AQUIS。分析表明,新老成员国之间在差异化问题上的讨价还价受到较弱候选人平等甚至优惠待遇的制约。
What is the effect of European Union (EU) enlargement on differentiated integration? And is it driven by the relative bargaining power of old and new member states or by the equal or even preferential treatment of weaker candidates? This article analyses differentiation in EU treaty and secondary law across the EU’s six enlargement rounds. It shows that exemptive differentiation privileging the new member states has been more frequent than discriminatory differentiation. Whereas there is some evidence that poorer new members suffer more strongly from discrimination, most of the variation in differentiation across new member states is explained by differences between enlargement rounds. In addition, the EU grants poorer candidates more time to fully adopt the EU acquis. The analysis suggests that bargaining between old and new member states over differentiation is constrained by the equal and even preferential treatment of weaker candidates.
DOI: --
发表时间: 2001
影响因子: 7.8
作者:
F. Schimmelfennig
通讯作者: F. Schimmelfennig
解释欧盟外交政策的谈判:规范制度主义和替代方法
DOI: 10.1057/ip.2009.7
发表时间: 2009
影响因子: 1.4
作者:
D. Thomas
通讯作者: D. Thomas
欧洲的选择:从墨西拿到马斯特里赫特的社会目的和国家权力
DOI: --
发表时间: 1998
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
A. Moravcsik
通讯作者: A. Moravcsik
歧视性的欧盟成员身份和扩大收益的重新分配
DOI: 10.1177/0022002707302793
发表时间: 2007
影响因子: 3.1
作者:
Thomas Plümper;C. Schneider
通讯作者: C. Schneider
DOI: --
发表时间: 2007
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
C. Schneider
通讯作者: C. Schneider