COVID-19 vaccine rumors and conspiracy theories: The need for cognitive inoculation against misinformation to improve vaccine adherence.

COVID-19 vaccine rumors and conspiracy theories: The need for cognitive inoculation against misinformation to improve vaccine adherence.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0251605
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Seale H
Seale H
中科院分区:
综合性期刊3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Islam MS;Kamal AM;Kabir A;Southern DL;Khan SH;Hasan SMM;Sarkar T;Sharmin S;Das S;Roy T;Harun MGD;Chughtai AA;Homaira N;Seale H

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

谣言和阴谋论可能会导致疫苗犹豫。监测与COVID-19候选疫苗相关的在线数据可以实时跟踪疫苗错误信息,并有助于消除其影响。这项研究旨在检查在线平台上传播的COVID-19疫苗谣言和阴谋论,了解其背景,然后审查管理这些错误信息并提高疫苗接受度的干预措施。于2020年6月,我们成立了一个跨专业团队,以审查和收集2019年12月31日至2020年11月30日期间的网上谣言和阴谋论。来源包括谷歌、谷歌事实核查、Facebook、YouTube、Twitter、事实核查机构网站以及电视和报纸网站。提取定量数据,输入Excel电子表格,并使用统计软件包R版本4.0.3进行连续分析。我们对来自新闻文章、在线报道和博客的定性信息进行了内容分析,并与定量数据的结果进行了比较。根据事实核查机构的评级,信息被分为真实、虚假、误导或夸大。我们发现了637个与COVID-19疫苗相关的项目:91%是谣言,9%是来自52个国家的阴谋论。在578个谣言中,36%与疫苗的开发、可用性和可获得性有关,20%与发病率和死亡率有关,8%与安全性、有效性和可接受性有关,其余为其他类别。在637个条目中,5%(30/637)是真实的,83%(528/637)是虚假的,10%(66/637)是误导性的,2%(13/637)是夸大的。谣言和阴谋论可能导致不信任,导致疫苗犹豫。实时追踪COVID-19疫苗错误信息,并与社交媒体合作传播正确信息,有助于保护公众免受错误信息的影响。
Rumors and conspiracy theories, can contribute to vaccine hesitancy. Monitoring online data related to COVID-19 vaccine candidates can track vaccine misinformation in real-time and assist in negating its impact. This study aimed to examine COVID-19 vaccine rumors and conspiracy theories circulating on online platforms, understand their context, and then review interventions to manage this misinformation and increase vaccine acceptance. In June 2020, a multi-disciplinary team was formed to review and collect online rumors and conspiracy theories between 31 December 2019–30 November 2020. Sources included Google, Google Fact Check, Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, fact-checking agency websites, and television and newspaper websites. Quantitative data were extracted, entered in an Excel spreadsheet, and analyzed descriptively using the statistical package R version 4.0.3. We conducted a content analysis of the qualitative information from news articles, online reports and blogs and compared with findings from quantitative data. Based on the fact-checking agency ratings, information was categorized as true, false, misleading, or exaggerated. We identified 637 COVID-19 vaccine-related items: 91% were rumors and 9% were conspiracy theories from 52 countries. Of the 578 rumors, 36% were related to vaccine development, availability, and access, 20% related to morbidity and mortality, 8% to safety, efficacy, and acceptance, and the rest were other categories. Of the 637 items, 5% (30/) were true, 83% (528/637) were false, 10% (66/637) were misleading, and 2% (13/637) were exaggerated. Rumors and conspiracy theories may lead to mistrust contributing to vaccine hesitancy. Tracking COVID-19 vaccine misinformation in real-time and engaging with social media to disseminate correct information could help safeguard the public against misinformation.
DOI: 10.3325/cmj.2016.57.516
发表时间: 2016-10-31
影响因子: 1.9
作者:
Pelčić G;Karačić S;Mikirtichan GL;Kubar OI;Leavitt FJ;Cheng-Tek Tai M;Morishita N;Vuletić S;Tomašević L
通讯作者: Tomašević L
DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.07.046
发表时间: 2018-10-01
影响因子: 4
作者:
Lavorgna, L.;De Stefano, M.;Bonavita, S.
通讯作者: Bonavita, S.
DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(13)70108-7
发表时间: 2013-07-01
影响因子: 56.3
作者:
Larson, Heidi J.;Smith, David M. D.;Madoff, Lawrence C.
通讯作者: Madoff, Lawrence C.
DOI: 10.1177/1529100618760521
发表时间: 2017-12-01
影响因子: 25.4
作者:
Brewer, Noel T.;Chapman, Gretchen B.;Kempe, Allison
通讯作者: Kempe, Allison
DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2020.1393
发表时间: 2020-11-02
期刊: JAMA health forum
影响因子: --
作者:
Lewis, Jarrett Ramos
通讯作者: Lewis, Jarrett Ramos