On methodology and myths: exploring the International Crisis Group’s organisational culture
On methodology and myths: exploring the International Crisis Group’s organisational culture
复制标题
论方法论和神话:探索国际危机组织的组织文化
DOI:
10.1080/01436597.2014.924064
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
2
通讯作者:
liesemann de Guevara
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
liesemann de Guevara
Exploring the historiography of the International Crisis Group (icg), this article looks critically at the narratives surrounding the organisation’s self-declared success. The focus is specifically on the so-calledicgmethodology, consisting of field-based research and analysis, practical policy recommendations and high-level advocacy. Combining a three-level approach to the analysis of organisational cultures with Yanow’s concept of organisational myths, the article argues that theicgmethodology contains a number of organisational myths that are meant to mask tensions and contradictions in the organisation’s underpinning basic assumptions and values, which, if publicly discussed, could have the power to undermine its expert authority. The four myths looked at in detail are the ‘field facts myth’, the ‘myth of flexible pragmatism’, the ‘myth of uniqueness’ and the ‘neutrality/independence myth’.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a037144
发表时间:
1992
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
D. Yanow
通讯作者:
D. Yanow
DOI:
10.1016/s0959-3780(97)82909-3
发表时间:
1997
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
S. Shackley
通讯作者:
S. Shackley
DOI:
10.1017/cbo9780511616839.001
发表时间:
2006
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Jeffrey Alexander;Jason L. Mast
通讯作者:
Jason L. Mast
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Berit Bliesemann de Guevara
通讯作者:
Berit Bliesemann de Guevara
DOI:
10.1007/978-3-531-90320-0_15
发表时间:
2006
影响因子:
4.2
作者:
Edwin Stiller
通讯作者:
Edwin Stiller