The intermixed-blocked effect in human perceptual learning is not the consequence of trial spacing.

The intermixed-blocked effect in human perceptual learning is not the consequence of trial spacing.
复制标题

人类知觉学习中的混合阻塞效应并不是试验间隔的结果。

DOI:
10.1037/0278-7393.34.1.237
复制
发表时间:
2008
期刊:
Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
G. Hall
G. Hall
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
C. Mitchell;S. Nash;G. Hall

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在人类和动物中的一个强有力的发现是,混合暴露于2个相似的刺激(AX/BX)比暴露于2个单独的块(CX_DX)中的2个同样相似的刺激(混合阻断效应)在测试中更好地区分这些刺激。这种混合-阻断效应可能是间隔练习优于集中练习的一个例子;在混合但不是阻断的暴露方案中,给定刺激的每次呈现(例如,AX)通过其伙伴(BX)的表示与下一个分隔开。两个人类参与者的实验复制了混合阻断效应,并表明这种效应不是由于暴露试验的间隔。结合联想学习和记忆理论,提出了混合阻断效应的产生机制。
A robust finding in humans and animals is that intermixed exposure to 2 similar stimuli (AX/BX) results in better discriminability of those stimuli on test than does exposure to 2 equally similar stimuli in 2 separate blocks (CX_DX)--the intermixed-blocked effect. This intermixed-blocked effect may be an example of the superiority of spaced over massed practice; in the intermixed, but not the blocked exposure regime, each presentation of a given stimulus (e.g., AX) is separated from the next by the presentation of its partner (BX). Two experiments with human participants replicated the intermixed-blocked effect and showed that the effect was not due to the spacing of exposure trials. A mechanism for the intermixed-blocked effect is proposed, which combines theories from associative learning and memory.
人类的学习和记忆。
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.003215
发表时间: 1987
影响因子: 24.8
作者:
Johnson,MK;Hasher,L
通讯作者: Hasher,L