Bizarre imagery: The misremembered mnemonic.

Bizarre imagery: The misremembered mnemonic.
复制标题

奇怪的图像:记错的助记符。

DOI:
10.1037/0278-7393.12.1.42
复制
发表时间:
1986
期刊:
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Karen T. Angin
Karen T. Angin
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
N. Kroll;E. M. Schepeler;Karen T. Angin

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

通过两个实验考察了奇异意象和意象交互对词对短时记忆和长时记忆的影响。实验一的被试被要求完成一个附带学习任务,并同时完成自由回忆任务和线索回忆任务。实验二的被试完成了有意学习任务,并进行了线索回忆测验。由于实验1的延迟测试中的表现非常差,实验2中的受试者被给予了更密集的训练程序。在这两个实验中,奇怪的图像并没有比合理的互动图像更能提高记忆力。在这两个保留间隔的图像中的相互作用的程度是一个很强的决定因素的线索回忆性能。在实验2中,大多数受试者在线索回忆测试后被询问,他们认为他们记住的奇怪的配对比合理的配对多,尽管事实显然并非如此。
Two experiments were performed to measure the effects of bizarre imagery and image interaction on the brief and long-term memory of word pairs. Subjects in Experiment 1 performed an incidental learning task and were tested with both free-and cued-recall tasks. Subjects in Experiment 2 performed intentional learning tasks and were tested with cued-recall tests. Because performance in the delayed tests of Experiment 1 was extremely poor, subjects in Experiment 2 were given a much more intensive training procedure. In both experiments, bizarre imagery did not improve memory more than plausible, interactive imagery. The degree of interaction in the image was a strong determinant of cued-recall performance at both retention intervals. Most subjects in Experiment 2, questioned after their cued-recall test, believed that they had remembered more bizarre than plausible pairs, even though this was clearly not the case.
人类的学习和记忆。
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.003215
发表时间: 1987
影响因子: 24.8
作者:
Johnson,MK;Hasher,L
通讯作者: Hasher,L