EphB4-targeted imaging with antibody h131, h131-F(ab')2 and h131-Fab.
EphB4-targeted imaging with antibody h131, h131-F(ab')2 and h131-Fab.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/mp400354y
复制
发表时间:
2013-12-02
影响因子:
4.9
通讯作者:
Conti PS
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Li D;Liu S;Liu R;Zhou Y;Park R;Naga K;Krasnoperov V;Gill PS;Li Z;Shan H;Conti PS
Accumulating evidence suggests that overexpression of the tyrosine kinase receptor EphB4, a mediator of vascular development, is a novel target for tumor diagnosis, prognosis and therapy. Noninvasive imaging of EphB4 expression could therefore be valuable for evaluating disease course and therapeutic efficacy at the earliest stages of anti-EphB4 treatment. In this study, we systematically investigated the use of anti-EphB4 antibody h131 (150 kD) and its fragments (h131-F(ab′)2, 110 kD; h131-Fab, 50 kD) for near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging of EphB4 expression in vivo. h131-F(ab′)2 and h131-Fab were produced through pepsin and papain digestion of h131 respectively, whose purity was confirmed by FPLC and SDS-PAGE. After conjugation with Cy5.5, in vivo characteristics of h131, h131-F(ab′)2 and h131-Fab were evaluated in EphB4-positive HT29 tumor model. Although h131-Cy5.5 demonstrated highest tumor uptake among these probes, its optimal tumor uptake level was obtained at 2 d post injection (p.i.). For h131-Fab-Cy5.5, maximum tumor uptake was achieved at 4 h p.i.. However, no significant difference was observed between h131-Fab-Cy5.5 and hIgG-Fab-Cy5.5, indicating the tumor accumulation was mainly caused by passive targeting. In contrast, h131-F(ab′)2-Cy5.5 demonstrated prominent tumor uptake at 6 h p.i. The target specificity was confirmed by hIgG-F(ab′)2-Cy5.5 control and immunofluorescent staining. Collectively, h131-F(ab′)2 exhibited prominent and specific tumor uptake at early time points, which suggests it is a promising agent for EphB4-targeted imaging.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Spannuth WA;Mangala LS;Stone RL;Carroll AR;Nishimura M;Shahzad MM;Lee SJ;Moreno-Smith M;Nick AM;Liu R;Jennings NB;Lin YG;Merritt WM;Coleman RL;Vivas-Mejia PE;Zhou Y;Krasnoperov V;Lopez-Berestein G;Gill PS;Sood AK
通讯作者:
Sood AK
影响因子:
2.8
作者:
Wu, QH;Suo, ZH;Nesland, JM
通讯作者:
Nesland, JM
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Kumar, S. R.;Masood, R.;Spannuth, W. A.;Singh, J.;Scehnet, J.;Kleiber, G.;Jennings, N.;Deavers, M.;Krasnoperov, V.;Dubeau, L.;Weaver, F. A.;Sood, A. K.;Gill, P. S.
通讯作者:
Gill, P. S.
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
Olafsen T;Wu AM
通讯作者:
Wu AM
DOI:
10.1006/bbrc.1996.1442
发表时间:
1996-09-24
影响因子:
3.1
作者:
Berclaz, G;Andres, AC;Crompton, MR
通讯作者:
Crompton, MR