When emotions run high: affective responses to crises in Europe

When emotions run high: affective responses to crises in Europe
复制标题

当情绪高涨时:对欧洲危机的情感反应

DOI:
10.1080/13511610.2022.2040832
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
The European Journal of Social Science Research
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Verbalyte M
Verbalyte M
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Verbalyte M

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

这期《创新》特刊探讨了欧洲危机中的情感经济,并试图将情感世界与制度行为、政策决定和公民感知联系起来。情绪通常被规范地判断为“理性的他者”(Demertzis 2013)或被视为其他东西的占位符,如身份,耸人听闻或病毒。然而,从政治心理学的角度来看,情绪具有指导个人在社会政治世界中航行的关键功能。例如,他们提供了一个层次来理解投票偏好(例如Brader 2006; Lodge和Taber 2013; Redlawsk,Civettini和Lau 2007),政治态度(例如Capelos和Katsanidou 2018;纳皮耶和Jost 2008)和政治行为(例如Capelos和Demertzis 2018; Goodwin,碧玉和Polletta 2001)。这期特刊的目的是超越对情感的经典探索,在情感现象和更广泛的政治发展之间架起一座桥梁。此外,在分析愤怒和恐惧的传统情绪反应时,这一特刊的贡献揭示了研究较少的情绪,如羞耻,同情,怀旧,希望,骄傲,怨恨和信任。在这个意义上,这期特刊聚焦于危机的角色,危机是创造一个特定环境的事件,在这个环境下,决策是由情绪来制定、证明和合法化的。因此,我们可以把危机看作是那些“关键时刻”(Collier and Collier 1991),作为公共领域中情绪被提高和强调的时期,作为决定公民行动和反应的催化剂。在危机期间,政治沟通战略为公民理解正在发生的事件提供情感指导。民粹主义政治行动者也在危机时期找到了肥沃的土壤,利用情绪高度获得政治利益(Moffitt 2015),为所涉问题,问题和挑战创造新的框架和沟通策略。在这篇社论中,我们首先介绍了该特刊的贡献,回顾了危机时期情绪在塑造政治观点和身份方面的相关性,并展示了它们与民粹主义的联系。成功。然后,我们转向介绍这一特刊的文章,重点关注围绕情绪处理的新兴主题,以及在危机时期重建特定案例和欧洲的情绪景观。最后,我们强调的方法和理论创新的文章,在推进我们的知识的情绪和政治行为之间的联系,以及如何提供严谨的研究工作。使用不同的理论方法和分析方法-定量调查,以及更多的定性话语,内容,政策和叙事分析-贡献提供了一个全面的解释力的情绪在理解如何在欧洲当前的危机(难民和金融危机,欧洲怀疑主义和民粹主义上升)是至关重要的解释力。
This special issue of Innovation tackles the emotional economy of crises in Europe and attempts to link the affective world to institutional behaviour, policy decisions, and citizens’ perceptions. Emotions are often judged normatively as the ‘other of rationality’(Demertzis 2013) or treated as a placeholder for something else, like identity, sensationalism or virality. Yet from a political psychology point of view, emotions have crucial functions that guide individuals while they navigate the socio-political world. For example, they offer a layer to understand voting preferences (eg Brader 2006; Lodge and Taber 2013; Redlawsk, Civettini, and Lau 2007), political attitudes (eg Capelos and Katsanidou 2018; Napier and Jost 2008) and political behaviour (eg Capelos and Demertzis 2018; Goodwin, Jasper, and Polletta 2001). The purpose of this special issue is to go beyond the classic exploration of emotions and to provide a bridge between affective phenomena and wider political developments. In addition, while analysing traditional emotional reactions of anger and fear, the contributions in this special issue shed light on less researched emotions such as shame, compassion, nostalgia, hope, pride, ressentiment and trust. To that extent, the special issue zooms into the role of crises as events that create a particular environment, under which decisions are framed, justified, and legitimised by emotions.We can, therefore, consider crises as those ‘critical junctures’(Collier and Collier 1991), as periods of time when emotions are heightened and emphasised in the public sphere, acting as catalysts in determining citizens’ actions and reactions. During crises, political communication strategies offer emotional guidance to citizens for making sense of the unfolding events. Populist political actors also find fertile ground in times of crises to take advantage of the emotional height for political gains (Moffitt 2015), by creating new framings and communication strategies for the issues, problems and challenges at stake. In this editorial, which acts as an introduction to the contributions of the special issue, we start by providing a brief state of the art, reviewing the relevance of emotions in times of crises, in shaping political views and identities and demonstrate their link to populist success. We then turn to the presentation of the articles of this special issue, focusing on emerging themes around the handling of emotions as well as reconstructing the case-specific and European emotional landscape in times of crises. Finally, we highlight the methodological and theoretical innovations of the articles in advancing our knowledge of the link between emotions and political behaviour, and ways to provide rigour to such research endeavors. Using different theoretical approaches and methods of analysis–quantitative surveys, alongside more qualitative discourse, content, policy and narrative analyses–contributions provide a comprehensive account of the crucial explanatory power of emotions in understanding how current crises in Europe (the refugee and financial crises, rising Euroscepticism and populism) are
特朗普言论的力量:民粹主义危机叙事和本体论安全
DOI: 10.1080/09557571.2019.1575796
发表时间: 2019
影响因子: 1.4
作者:
Homolar A
通讯作者: Homolar A
DOI: --
发表时间: 2000
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
B. Thalheim
通讯作者: B. Thalheim
DOI: 10.1177/0010414018789490
发表时间: 2018-11-01
影响因子: 5
作者:
Mudde, Cas;Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristobal
通讯作者: Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristobal
对移民的情绪反应以及对欧盟在移民和恐怖主义方面合作的支持
DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2019.1630470
发表时间: 2019
影响因子: 4.2
作者:
Erisen C
通讯作者: Erisen C
情感动员:右翼民粹主义政党支持的情感基础
DOI: --
发表时间: 2021
期刊: The Palgrave Handbook of Populism
影响因子: --
作者:
Hans‐Georg Betz;Michael T. Oswald
通讯作者: Michael T. Oswald