Sociophonetic perspectives on stylistic diversity in speech research
Sociophonetic perspectives on stylistic diversity in speech research
复制标题
言语研究中风格多样性的社会语音学视角
作者：
Lauren Hall;Zack Boyd
摘要社会语言学数据收集传统上包括访谈、阅读文章和词汇表(Labov 1972)。研究人员越来越多地寻找启发式任务，这些任务具有基于朗读的任务的好处(例如，研究不常见的变量；控制语言因素；在参与者之间引出相同的词条)，同时还能引出与面试演讲更相似的风格(参见Drager 2018)。例子包括地图任务(Brown等人，和Diapix任务(贝克和哈桑，2011年)。其他研究人员转而从事最大限度提高生态有效性的启发式任务，使自己脱离录音环境，并培训参与者收集实地录音(例如，Podesva 2007；Sharma 2011)。但是，从这些任务中得出的演讲有多大可比性？基于先前研究的结果(Boyd等人2015年；Hall-Lew和Boyd 2017)，我们考虑了三个说英语的美国人的元音作品，这些作品来自采访、阅读文章、实验室任务和自我录音。我们认为，实验室任务和自我录音都有可能提高社会语音学研究中描述的准确性和索引分析。
Abstract Sociolinguistic data collection traditionally includes interviews, reading passages, and word lists (Labov 1972). Researchers have increasingly sought out elicitation tasks that have the benefits of tasks based on reading aloud (e.g., studying infrequently occurring variables; controlling for linguistic factors; eliciting the same lexical items across participants) while also eliciting styles more comparable to interview speech (see Drager 2018). Examples include the Map Task (Brown et al. 1984) and the Diapix task (Baker and Hazan 2011). Other researchers have turned instead to elicitation tasks that maximize ecological validity, taking themselves out of the recording context and training participants to collect field recordings (e.g., Podesva 2007; Sharma 2011). But how comparable is the speech elicited from each of these tasks? Building on results from previous research (Boyd et al. 2015; Hall-Lew and Boyd 2017) we consider three US English speakers’ vowel productions from interviews, reading passages, ‘Lab Tasks’, and self-recordings. We suggest that both Lab Tasks and self-recordings have the potential to increase descriptive accuracy and indexical analysis in sociophonetic research.
英式亚洲英语的风格曲目和社会变迁
影响因子：
1.9
作者：
Sharma D
通讯作者：
Sharma D