Putting the Research Boot on the Policymakers' Foot: Can Participatory Approaches Change the Relationship between Policymakers and Evaluation?
Putting the Research Boot on the Policymakers' Foot: Can Participatory Approaches Change the Relationship between Policymakers and Evaluation?
复制标题
将研究的靴子放在政策制定者的脚上：参与式方法能否改变政策制定者与评估之间的关系？
DOI：
10.1111/spol.12031
复制
发表时间：
2013
影响因子：
3.2
通讯作者：
Richardson L
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Richardson L
第8章中国进出口企业的贸易伙伴、贸易产品和企业绩效：加工贸易有影响吗？ 在这项研究中，我们探索了一个新的独特的数据集，将中国的国际贸易交易与其制造业企业的普查数据联系起来，并建立了一些有趣的程式化事实，将企业的关键经济表现与其进出口行为联系起来。我们的分析的一个新奇在于，我们区分了普通贸易和加工贸易;后者涉及进口投入品和材料，然后组装并再出口到海外市场。出现了几种新的模式。首先，我们发现双向贸易者在规模、生产率和要素密集度方面存在显著的异质性，这取决于他们对进出口加工的参与程度。虽然现有的文献通常发现双向交易者比单向交易者更大，更有生产力，但我们发现，与单向交易者相比，纯处理双向交易者实际上是生产力最低的，并且表现出最低的资本/技能强度。第二，与市场层级假说相一致，规模较大、生产力较高的企业与数量较多的贸易伙伴进行贸易，这些贸易伙伴平均而言“不太受欢迎”，其特点是距离较长、市场规模较小。值得注意的是，这一格局在出口与进口、普通贸易与加工贸易之间高度对称。第三，资本和技能密集度较高的公司从人均收入较高的国家采购更复杂的投入，这种模式只适用于普通进口，而不适用于加工进口。虽然我们的一些研究结果证实了现有的程式化的事实报告，为其他国家，我们发现的一些模式是新的文献，仍然是不一致的异质性企业贸易理论。
8. Trading Partners, Traded Products and Firm Performances of China's Exporter‐Importers: Does Processing Trade Make a Difference?Zheng Wang and Zhihong YuIn this study, we explore a newly available unique data set that links China's international trade transactions to its manufacturing firms' census data and establish a number of interesting stylised facts linking firms' key economic performances to their exporting‐importing behaviours. One novelty of our analysis is that we distinguish between ordinary trade and processing trade; the latter involves importing inputs and materials to be assembled and re‐exported to the overseas market. Several novel patterns emerge. First, we discover significant heterogeneity within two‐way traders – in terms of size, productivity and factor intensity – depending on their engagement in processing exports/imports. Whilst the existing literature typically finds that two‐way traders are larger and more productive than one‐way traders, we show that pure processing two‐way traders are actually the least productive and exhibit the lowest capita/skill intensity compared to one‐way traders. Second, consistent with the market hierarchy hypothesis, larger and more productive firms trade with a larger number of trade partners that are on average ‘less popular’ as characterised by longer distances and smaller market size. Remarkably, this pattern is highly symmetric between exports and imports, as well as between ordinary and processing trade. Third, firms with greater capital and skill intensities source more complex inputs from countries with higher income per capita, and this pattern holds only for ordinary imports but not for processing imports. While some of our findings confirm existing stylised facts reported for other countries, some patterns we discover are new to the literature and remain to be reconciled with the heterogeneous firm trade theory.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
--
发表时间：
1999
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
G. Leicester
通讯作者：
G. Leicester
研究对政策的影响有多大
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
G. Walt
通讯作者：
G. Walt
观点：社论：什么有效？
影响因子：
2.5
作者：
H. Davies;S. Nutley;Peter C. Smith
通讯作者：
Peter C. Smith
美好社会的政策分析
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
P. Deleon;Ralph C. Longobardi
通讯作者：
Ralph C. Longobardi
捕捉复杂的现实：了解公共卫生领域为实现循证政策和实践所做的努力
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Smith K
通讯作者：
Smith K