Working it out: Will the improved management of leaky bodies in the workplace create a dialogue between medical sociology and disability studies?
Working it out: Will the improved management of leaky bodies in the workplace create a dialogue between medical sociology and disability studies?
复制标题
解决这个问题：改善工作场所漏气身体的管理是否会在医学社会学和残疾研究之间建立对话？
DOI：
10.1111/1467-9566.13519
复制
发表时间：
2023
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Remnant J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Remnant J
This article focuses on the workplace as a significant site of convergence between the disciplines of medical sociology and disability studies. As disability remains on the margins of sociological exploration and theorising relating to health and work, disabled workers remain on the margins of the workforce, subject to disproportionate rates of unemployment, under employment and workplace mistreatment. The article focuses on the experiences of people with ‘leaky bodies’, focussing specifically on employees who experience troubling menstruation and/or have gynaecological health conditions. It brings together data from three studies conducted between 2017 and 2020; interviews with disabled academics (n= 75), university staff with gynaecological health conditions (n= 23), and key stakeholders in universities (n= 36) (including university executives, line managers and human resources staff). These studies had separate, but linked foci, on the inaccessibility of workplaces, managing gynaecological health conditions at work and supporting disabled people at work respectively. Drawing on the Social Relational Model of disability and theories of embodiment, we explore the experiences and management of workers with leaky bodies in UK University workplaces. Data illustrates how workplace practices undermine embodied experiences of workers with ‘leaky’ bodies by maintaining workplaces which ignore their material reality. We highlight that addressing embodied needs alongside acknowledging disabled people as an oppressed political category represents a theoretical meeting point for disability studies and medical sociology.
登录
查看更多内容
没有我们，就没有我们的事
DOI：
10.4324/9781003199113-10
发表时间：
2021
期刊：
Black Feminist Sociology
影响因子：
--
作者：
E. L. Hayes;Ashley E. Hollingshead;Jomaira Salas Pujols;Brooklynn K. Hitchens
通讯作者：
Brooklynn K. Hitchens
影响因子：
14.6
作者：
G. Reaume
通讯作者：
G. Reaume
教师对学术工作评估方式的看法：性别差异
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Z. Todd;A. Madill;N. Shaw;N. Bown
通讯作者：
N. Bown
“学者不是朝九晚五的工作”：长时间工作和英国学术界的“理想工作者”
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2015
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Katherine J C Sang;Abigail Powell;R. Finkel;J. Richards
通讯作者：
J. Richards
残疾学者：加拿大大学的案例研究
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
Bea Waterfield;Brenda B. Beagan;Merlinda Weinberg
通讯作者：
Merlinda Weinberg