A prospective multicenter pilot study of HIV-positive deceased donor to HIV-positive recipient kidney transplantation: HOPE in action.
A prospective multicenter pilot study of HIV-positive deceased donor to HIV-positive recipient kidney transplantation: HOPE in action.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1111/ajt.16205
复制
发表时间:
2021-05
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
HOPE in Action Investigators
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Durand CM;Zhang W;Brown DM;Yu S;Desai N;Redd AD;Bagnasco SM;Naqvi FF;Seaman S;Doby BL;Ostrander D;Bowring MG;Eby Y;Fernandez RE;Friedman-Moraco R;Turgeon N;Stock P;Chin-Hong P;Mehta S;Stosor V;Small CB;Gupta G;Mehta SA;Wolfe CR;Husson J;Gilbert A;Cooper M;Adebiyi O;Agarwal A;Muller E;Quinn TC;Odim J;Huprikar S;Florman S;Massie AB;Tobian AAR;Segev DL;HOPE in Action Investigators
HIV-positive donor to HIV-positive recipient (HIV D+/R+) transplantation is permitted in the United States under the HIV Organ Policy Equity Act. To explore safety and the risk attributable to an HIV+ donor, we performed a prospective multicenter pilot study comparing HIV D+/R+ vs HIV-negative donor to HIV+ recipient (HIV D−/R+) kidney transplantation (KT). From 3/2016 to 7/2019 at 14 centers, there were 75 HIV+ KTs: 25 D+ and 50 D− (22 recipients from D− with false positive HIV tests). Median follow-up was 1.7 years. There were no deaths nor differences in 1-year graft survival (91% D+ vs 92% D−, P = .9), 1-year mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (63 mL/min D+ vs 57 mL/min D−, P = .31), HIV breakthrough (4% D+ vs 6% D−, P > .99), infectious hospitalizations (28% vs 26%, P = .85), or opportunistic infections (16% vs 12%, P = .72). One-year rejection was higher for D+ recipients (50% vs 29%, HR: 1.83, 95% CI 0.84–3.95, P = .13) but did not reach statistical significance; rejection was lower with lymphocyte-depleting induction (21% vs 44%, HR: 0.33, 95% CI 0.21–0.87, P = .03). In this multicenter pilot study directly comparing HIV D+/R+ with HIV D−/R+ KT, overall transplant and HIV outcomes were excellent; a trend toward higher rejection with D+ raises concerns that merit further investigation.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
9
作者:
Boyarsky, Brian J.;Segev, Dorry L.
通讯作者:
Segev, Dorry L.
影响因子:
2.1
作者:
Cash, Ayla;Luo, Xun;Durand, Christine M.
通讯作者:
Durand, Christine M.
影响因子:
8.8
作者:
Kucirka, L. M.;Durand, C. M.;Segev, D. L.
通讯作者:
Segev, D. L.
影响因子:
1.7
作者:
Ambaraghassi G;Cardinal H;Corsilli D;Fortin C;Fortin MC;Martel-Laferrière V;Malaise J;Pâquet MR;Rouleau D
通讯作者:
Rouleau D
影响因子:
1.4
作者:
Azar, Marwan M.;Malinis, Maricar F.;Villanueva, Merceditas S.
通讯作者:
Villanueva, Merceditas S.