Rapprochement and Reform: Overcoming Factionalism in Policy Making for Serious Mental Illness.

Rapprochement and Reform: Overcoming Factionalism in Policy Making for Serious Mental Illness.
复制标题

DOI:
10.1176/appi.ps.202100450
复制
发表时间:
2022-05
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Sisti, Dominic A.
Sisti, Dominic A.
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Smith, William R.;Sisti, Dominic A.

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

本文追溯了从非制度化到今天的SMI政策制定和倡导中的派系斗争的历史。它利用协商民主理论来说明派系宣传如何导致倡导者和政策制定者未能履行代表SMI患者的职责,以及这种派系斗争如何滋生不信任并破坏解决SMI患者需求的努力。它建议成立一个公共精神卫生政策委员会,以协商民主原则为指导,以克服派系斗争,改善SMI政策。
This paper traces the history of factionalism in SMI policy making and advocacy from deinstitutionalization to the present day. It draws on deliberative democratic theory to illustrate how factionalist advocacy causes advocates and policy-makers to fail in their duties to represent those with SMI and how this factionalism has bred distrust and undermined efforts to address the needs of people with SMI. It proposes a Public Mental Health Policy Commission, guided by principles of deliberative democracy, to overcome factionalism and improve SMI policy.
DOI: 10.1038/mp.2017.139
发表时间: 2018-04-01
影响因子: 11
作者:
Allison, S.;Bastiampillai, T.;Sharfstein, S. S.
通讯作者: Sharfstein, S. S.
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185642
发表时间: 2013-01-01
期刊: ANNUAL REVIEW OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 9
影响因子: --
作者:
Braslow, Joel Tupper
通讯作者: Braslow, Joel Tupper
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00855
发表时间: 2019-12-06
影响因子: 4.7
作者:
de Mooij, Liselotte D.;Kikkert, Martijn;Dekker, Jack J. M.
通讯作者: Dekker, Jack J. M.
DOI: 10.1002/wps.20128
发表时间: 2014-06-01
期刊: WORLD PSYCHIATRY
影响因子: 73.3
作者:
Chesney, Edward;Goodwin, Guy M.;Fazel, Seena
通讯作者: Fazel, Seena
DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0153
发表时间: 2016-06-01
期刊: HEALTH AFFAIRS
影响因子: 9.7
作者:
Davidson, Larry
通讯作者: Davidson, Larry