Model and approach for assessing implementation context and fidelity in the HEALing Communities Study.
Model and approach for assessing implementation context and fidelity in the HEALing Communities Study.
复制标题
评估康复社区研究中实施环境和忠诚度的模型和方法。
DOI:
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108330
复制
发表时间:
2020-12-01
影响因子:
4.2
通讯作者:
Walker DM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Knudsen HK;Drainoni ML;Gilbert L;Huerta TR;Oser CB;Aldrich AM;Campbell ANC;Crable EL;Garner BR;Glasgow LM;Goddard-Eckrich D;Marks KR;McAlearney AS;Oga EA;Scalise AL;Walker DM
In response to the U.S. opioid epidemic, the HEALing (Helping to End Addiction Long-termSM) Communities Study (HCS) is a multisite, wait-listed, community-level cluster-randomized trial that aims to test the novel Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention, in 67 communities. CTH will expand an integrated set of evidence-based practices (EBPs) across health care, behavioral health, justice, and other community-based settings to reduce opioid overdose deaths. We present the rationale for and adaptation of the RE-AIM/PRISM framework and methodological approach used to capture the CTH implementation context and to evaluate implementation fidelity. HCS measures key domains of the internal and external CTH implementation context with repeated annual surveys and qualitative interviews with community coalition members and key stakeholders. Core constructs of fidelity include dosage, adherence, quality, and program differentiation—the adaptation of the CTH intervention to fit each community’s needs. Fidelity measures include a monthly CTH checklist, collation of artifacts produced during CTH activities, coalition and workgroup attendance, and coalition meeting minutes. Training and technical assistance delivered by the research sites to the communities are tracked monthly. To help attenuate the nation’s opioid epidemic, the adoption of EBPs must be increased in communities. The HCS represents one of the largest and most complex implementation research experiments yet conducted. Our systematic examination of implementation context and fidelity will significantly advance understanding of how to best evaluate community-level implementation of EBPs and assess relations among implementation context, fidelity, and intervention impact.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
12.7
作者:
Glasgow, RE;Vogt, TM;Boles, SM
通讯作者:
Boles, SM
DOI:
10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
发表时间:
2009-08-07
期刊:
Implementation science : IS
影响因子:
--
作者:
Damschroder LJ;Aron DC;Keith RE;Kirsh SR;Alexander JA;Lowery JC
通讯作者:
Lowery JC
影响因子:
2.3
作者:
Arthur, Michael W.;Hawkins, J. David;Abbott, Robert D.
通讯作者:
Abbott, Robert D.
影响因子:
5.2
作者:
Harden SM;Smith ML;Ory MG;Smith-Ray RL;Estabrooks PA;Glasgow RE
通讯作者:
Glasgow RE
DOI:
10.1177/109019819402100203
发表时间:
1994-06-01
期刊:
HEALTH EDUCATION QUARTERLY
影响因子:
--
作者:
ISRAEL, BA;CHECKOWAY, B;ZIMMERMAN, M
通讯作者:
ZIMMERMAN, M