From Proper Scoring Rules to Max-Min Optimal Forecast Aggregation
From Proper Scoring Rules to Max-Min Optimal Forecast Aggregation
复制标题
从适当的评分规则到最大-最小最优预测聚合
DOI:
10.1145/3465456.3467599
复制
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Roughgarden, Tim
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Neyman, Eric;Roughgarden, Tim
This paper forges a strong connection between two seemingly unrelated forecasting problems: incentive-compatible forecast elicitation and forecast aggregation. Proper scoring rules are the well-known solution to the former problem. To each such rules, we associate a corresponding method of aggregation, mapping expert forecasts and expert weights to a “consensus forecast,” which we callquasi-arithmetic (QA) poolingwith respect tos. We justify this correspondence in several ways: QA pooling with respect to the two most well-studied scoring rules (quadratic and logarithmic) corresponds to the two most well-studied forecast aggregation methods (linear and logarithmic); given a scoring rulesused for payment, a forecaster agent who subcontracts several experts, paying them in proportion to their weights, is best off aggregating the experts’ reports using QA pooling with respect tos, meaning this strategy maximizes its worst-case profit (over the possible outcomes); the score of an aggregator who uses QA pooling is concave in the experts’ weights (as a consequence, online gradient descent can be used to learn appropriate expert weights from repeated experiments with low regret); and the class of all QA pooling methods is characterized by a natural set of axioms (generalizing classical work by Kolmogorov on quasi-arithmetic means).Funding:This work was supported by the Division of Computing and Communication Foundations [Grant CCF-1813188], the Army Research Office [Grant W911NF1910294], and the Division of Graduate Education [Grant DGE-2036197].Supplemental Material:The e-companion is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2022.2414.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1145/1386790.1386813
发表时间:
2008-07
期刊:
--
影响因子:
--
作者:
Nicolas S. Lambert;David M. Pennock;Y. Shoham
通讯作者:
Nicolas S. Lambert;David M. Pennock;Y. Shoham
影响因子:
5.9
作者:
Hanson, R
通讯作者:
Hanson, R
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2021
期刊:
arXiv.org
影响因子:
--
作者:
Bo Waggoner
通讯作者:
Bo Waggoner
影响因子:
1.2
作者:
Christian J. Feldbacher;G. Schurz
通讯作者:
G. Schurz
影响因子:
56.9
作者:
E. Hayes
通讯作者:
E. Hayes