A Foundation for Russia? Memories of World War II for Young Russians

A Foundation for Russia? Memories of World War II for Young Russians
复制标题

俄罗斯基金会?

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
Nationalities Papers
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Nina Frieß
Nina Frieß
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Félix Krawatzek;Nina Frieß

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

俄罗斯年轻人如何看待第二次世界大战和战争时期的暴力?本文探讨了社会和精英驱动的历史叙事在一个关键的历史周年纪念的背景下融合的程度。我们证明,第二次世界大战的记忆作为一个综合性的历史事件的一个抽象的,时间上超越俄罗斯的想法。我们的分析借鉴了2019年6月在不同政治倾向的年轻人中进行的焦点小组,连续三年(2018-2020年)针对城市青年进行的调查数据,以及电影和文学等文化文物。年轻人对胜利和纪念的看法与流行的文化、政治、教育和历史话语之间有很大的重叠。然而,当涉及到当前的政治政权记住胜利的实际方式,斯大林的作用以及如何理解针对平民的暴力行为时,存在重大争议。因此,普京政权创造的共同历史观仍然存在争议。分歧限制了记忆在多大程度上可以成为当今俄罗斯政治的基础,因为年轻的受访者区分了他们对俄罗斯抽象理想和现有政治制度的支持。
Abstract How do young Russians relate to World War II and the violence of the wartime period? This article explores the degree to which societal and elite-driven narratives about history converge in the context of a crucial historical anniversary. We demonstrate that the memory of World War II serves as an integrative historical event for an abstract, temporally transcendent idea of Russia. Our analysis draws on focus groups conducted among young people of different political orientation in June 2019, survey data targeting urban youth, conducted over three consecutive years (2018–2020), and cultural artifacts such as film and literature. There is significant overlap between the views that young people express about victory and commemoration and the prevailing cultural, political, educational, and historical discourses. However, there is significant controversy when it comes to the actual ways in which the current political regime remembers the victory, the role of Stalin, and how to understand violence against the civilian population. The shared historical view that the Putin regime has created therefore remains contested. Disagreement limits the extent to which memory can be a foundation for today’s political Russia as young respondents differentiate between their support for an abstract ideal of Russia and the existing political system.
纠缠记忆:记忆研究的第三次浪潮
DOI: 10.1111/hith.10693
发表时间: 2014
期刊: History and Theory
影响因子: 1.1
作者:
Feindt;Gregor; Krawatzek;Félix; Mehler;Daniela; Pestel;Friedemann; Trimçev
通讯作者: Trimçev