Mindful Partnering: Introducing a Theoretical Construct and Testing Psychometric Properties of the Mindful Partnering Measure.
Mindful Partnering: Introducing a Theoretical Construct and Testing Psychometric Properties of the Mindful Partnering Measure.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/15332691.2021.1926386
复制
发表时间：
2022
影响因子：
1
通讯作者：
Coatsworth, J. Douglas
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Seiter, Natasha S.;Lucas-Thompson, Rachel G.;Prince, Mark A.;Quirk, Kelley;Coatsworth, J. Douglas
尽管有证据表明正念有很多好处，但对正念的人际关系形式的研究还不够深入。我们提出了一个新的理论结构，即专注伙伴关系的概念，即与自己的浪漫伴侣之间的人际专注；我们还对专注伙伴措施(MPM)进行了初步验证。研究对象为599人，他们来自：1)从大学被试池中招募的本科生样本(用于探索性因素分析，N=335)和2)通过机械突厥法招募的已婚成年人样本(用于验证性因素分析，N=264，用于结构效度的子集N=147，重测分析N=53)。EFA和CFA的结果支持由五个因素构成的子量表：(1)正念意识，(2)无反应性，(3)情感意识，(4)接纳/同情，(5)自我同情。对已婚成人样本的内部一致性、结构效度和重测信度的测试为MPM评估专注性伙伴关系的信度和效度以及专注性意识和接纳/同情心分量表提供了证据。然而，其他分量表没有显示出足够的重测信度。在进一步研究中使用这一措施将使我们能够研究留心合作的潜在相关性和好处，以加深我们对这一新结构的理解。
Although evidence suggests many benefits of mindfulness, interpersonal forms of mindfulness are understudied. We present the conceptualization of a novel theoretical construct, mindful partnering, as interpersonal mindfulness with ones’ romantic partner; we also present initial validation of the Mindful Partnering Measure (MPM). Participants were 599 individuals from: 1) an undergraduate student sample recruited from a University subject pool (used for exploratory factor analyses, N= 335) and 2) a sample of married adults that was recruited through Mechanical Turk (used for confirmatory factor analyses, N= 264, subsets used for construct validity N= 147, and test-retest analyses N= 53). Results of the EFA and CFA supported a five-factor structure with the subscales: (1) mindful awareness, (2) nonreactivity, (3) emotional awareness, (4) acceptance/compassion, and (5) self-compassion. Tests of internal consistency, construct validity, and test-retest reliability in the sample of married adults provided evidence for reliability and validity of the total MPM to assess mindful partnering, as well as the mindful awareness and acceptance/compassion subscales. However, the other subscales did not demonstrate adequate test-retest reliability. Use of this measure in further research will allow for the study of the potential correlates and benefits of mindful partnering to further our understanding of this novel construct.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI：
10.1080/10705519909540118
发表时间：
1999-01-01
影响因子：
6
作者：
Hu, Li-tze;Bentler, Peter M.
通讯作者：
Bentler, Peter M.
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
de Bruin, Esther I.;Topper, Maurice;Kamphuis, Jan H.
通讯作者：
Kamphuis, Jan H.
影响因子：
4.2
作者：
Bloch, Lian;Haase, Claudia M.;Levenson, Robert W.
通讯作者：
Levenson, Robert W.
影响因子：
7
作者：
Emons, Wilco H. M.;Sijtsma, Klaas;Meijer, Rob R.
通讯作者：
Meijer, Rob R.
影响因子：
3.6
作者：
de Bruin, Esther I.;Zijlstra, Bonne J. H.;Geurtzen, Naline;van Zundert, Rinka M. P.;van de Weijer-Bergsma, Eva;Hartman, Esther E.;Nieuwesteeg, Anke M.;Duncan, Larissa G.;Boegels, Susan M.
通讯作者：
Boegels, Susan M.