An Outcome Measure for Japanese People With Chronic Low Back Pain: An Introduction and Validation Study of Japan Low Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire
An Outcome Measure for Japanese People With Chronic Low Back Pain: An Introduction and Validation Study of Japan Low Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire
复制标题
日本慢性腰痛患者的结果测量：日本腰痛评估问卷的介绍和验证研究
作者：
O. Shirado;T. Doi;M. Akai;K. Fujino;Y. Hoshino;T. Iwaya
研究设计.为慢性腰痛（CLBP）患者制定一项全国性的基于患者的结局指标。Objective.本研究的目的是开发和引入一种新的方法来测量日本CLBP患者的结局（日本腰痛评估问卷[JLEQ]），并通过与Roland-Morris残疾问卷（RDQ）的比较来检查其有效性和可靠性。背景数据总结。CLBP是一个严重的问题，影响工人，特别是劳动者的健康和福利。其严重程度和残疾程度取决于患者的文化背景和心理情感方面。方法.以下项目进行了测试的JLEQ和RDQ使用心理测量学分析：内容效度，结构效度，效标效度，内部一致性信度，测试和重测信度。结果共有195例CLBP患者参加了这项研究。在JLEQ中没有下限和上限效应。JLEQ和RDQ的Cronbach α系数分别为0.971和0.893。JLEQ的重测组间相关系数为0.886，具有较好的重测信度。分类主成分分析表明，结构由3个项目集群的JLEQ。因子负荷模式表明，JLEQ项目分为3个领域，即，中等负荷组、负荷较低组和心理状况。使用赤池信息标准评价JLEQ和RDQ中问题项目之间的相关程度。结论JLEQ被证明是一个有效和可靠的问卷量表，用于测量CLBP患者的患者为基础的结果。
Study Design. Development of a nationwide patient-based outcome measure for patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Objective. The purpose of this study was to develop and introduce a new means of measuring outcomes for Japanese individuals with CLBP (the Japan Low Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire [JLEQ]), and to examine its validity and reliability by comparison with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RDQ). Summary of Background Data. CLBP is a serious problem affecting the health and welfare of workers, especially laborers. The severity and disability it causes vary depending on cultural background and the psycho-emotional aspect of the patients. Methods. The following items were tested for the JLEQ and the RDQ using psychometric analyses: content validity, construct validity, criterion validity, internal-consistency reliability, and test and retest reliability. Results. A total of 195 patients with CLBP participated in this study. There were no floor and ceiling effects in the JLEQ. Cronbach’s α coefficient was 0.971 and 0.893 for the JLEQ and RDQ, respectively. The test-retest interclass correlation coefficient in the JLEQ was 0.886, indicating good test-retest reliability. Categorical principal component analysis showed that the construct structure consisted of 3 item clusters in the JLEQ. The factor loading patterns indicated that the JLEQ items were separated into 3 domains, i.e., a moderately loaded group, a less loaded group, and psychological conditions. The degree of correlation between the question items in the JLEQ and RDQ was evaluated using Akaike Information Criteria. Conclusion. The JLEQ was shown to be a valid and reliable questionnaire scale for measurement of patient-based outcomes in CLBP patients.
卫生保健政策和研究机构急性腰痛临床实践指南。
DOI：
10.1002/art.1790080304
发表时间：
1995
期刊：
Arthritis care and research : the official journal of the Arthritis Health Professions Association
影响因子：
--
作者：
Katz,JN;Gall,V
通讯作者：
Gall,V