Emerging from emergency pandemic pedagogy: A survey of anatomical educators in the United Kingdom and Ireland.
Emerging from emergency pandemic pedagogy: A survey of anatomical educators in the United Kingdom and Ireland.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1002/ca.23758
复制
发表时间：
2021-09
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Campbell T
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dulohery K;Scully D;Longhurst GJ;Stone DM;Campbell T
至关重要的是，对流行病教育学的学术观点进行全面量化，以便为未来的实践提供信息。因此，本研究探讨了英国 (UK) 和爱尔兰共和国 (ROI) 的解剖学家如何看待针对 COVID-19 所做的教学调整，以及这些调整如何影响他们的教学经验、在线工作环境和社区。数据通过英国 15 所大学的 24 名解剖学家 (11) 和 ROI (4) 的问卷调查收集。在教学方面，95.6%的学者已经掌握了新技术，以满足远程教学的需求。学者（95.8%）更喜欢面对面的实践课程。大多数大学（80.0%）表示，实践课程将以确保社交距离的新形式继续进行。然而，50.0% 的学者不确定这些调整是否会改善学生的学习。许多解剖学家认为，新的调整可能会阻碍学生与学生（66.7%）和学生与导师（45.8%）的互动。在评估方面，52.6%的学者更喜欢传统方法而不是在线方法。远程在线评估很难防止串通，但为学者提供了节省时间的机会。最后，在工作环境方面，83.3%的学者表示工作量增加； 54.2% 的人更喜欢在现场工作而不是远程工作，79.2% 的人认为在现场工作时员工互动更好。这些结果表明，解剖学家普遍担心大流行引起的教学、评估和工作环境的适应。然而，我们还发现了重要的机会，这些机会最终可以使学生和教育工作者受益。
It is critical that academic opinion of pandemic pedagogy is comprehensively quantified in order to inform future practices. Thus, this study examines how anatomists in the United Kingdom (UK) and Republic of Ireland (ROI) perceive the teaching adaptations made in response to COVID‐19, and how these adaptations have impacted their experiences teaching, their online work environment and community. Data was collected via a questionnaire from 24 anatomists across 15 universities in the UK (11) and ROI (4). With regards to teaching, 95.6% of academics have upskilled in new technologies to meet the demands of distance teaching. Academics (95.8%) preferred face‐to‐face delivery of practical sessions. Most universities (80.0%) reported that practical sessions will continue in a new form that ensures social distancing. However, 50.0% of academics are uncertain if these adaptations will improve student learning. Many anatomists believe that the new adaptations may hinder student–student (66.7%) and student–tutor (45.8%) interactions. Regarding assessment, 52.6% of academics preferred traditional methods to online. Remote online assessment was difficult to protect against collusion, but provided time saving opportunities for academics. Finally, in terms of working environment, 83.3% of academics stated that their workload increased; 54.2% preferred working on site rather than remotely and 79.2% think that staff interactions are better when working on site. These results demonstrate a widespread concern amongst anatomists regarding the pandemic‐induced adaptations to teaching, assessment and working environment. However, important opportunities were also identified that could ultimately serve to benefit students and educators alike.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
7.3
作者：
Attardi, Stefanie M.;Choi, Suwhan;Rogers, Kem A.
通讯作者：
Rogers, Kem A.
影响因子：
4
作者：
Buelow, Janet R.;Barry, Thomas;Rich, Leigh E.
通讯作者：
Rich, Leigh E.
影响因子：
7.3
作者：
Drake, Richard L.;McBride, Jennifer M.;Pawlina, Wojciech
通讯作者：
Pawlina, Wojciech
影响因子：
7.3
作者：
Barry, Denis S.;Marzouk, Fadi;O'Keeffe, Gerard W.
通讯作者：
O'Keeffe, Gerard W.
DOI：
10.1016/j.fsisyn.2020.03.007
发表时间：
2020-01-01
期刊：
Forensic science international. Synergy
影响因子：
--
作者：
Finegan, Oran;Fonseca, Stephen;Winter, Kristy A
通讯作者：
Winter, Kristy A