Discussion-Based DEI Education to Help Create Inclusive and Open BME Research Lab Environments
Discussion-Based DEI Education to Help Create Inclusive and Open BME Research Lab Environments
复制标题
基于讨论的 DEI 教育有助于创建包容性和开放的 BME 研究实验室环境
DOI:
10.1007/s43683-022-00074-3
复制
发表时间:
2022
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Maisel, Katharina
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Naiknavare, Ritika;Maisel, Katharina
Diversity in teams has been shown to enhance creativity and innovation, particularly in teams where all members felt a sense of belonging. Creating an inclusive environment in a lab setting that provides a sense of belonging to all is challenging. This is particularly true in a field like Biomedical Engineering/Bioengineering where diversity is multifaceted and includes people’s diverse personal/cultural backgrounds and also diverse scientific backgrounds. In a research lab, there is additional diversity in training, as most labs contain trainees at different levels (undergrad, grad, postdoc, high school). To aid in creating a sense of belonging in a research lab, we have devised a novel initiative based upon open group discussions on diversity, equity, and inclusion topics. The initiative included a first presentation/discussion by the PI to set the stage for defining diversity, equity, and inclusion, and provided examples of existing DEI issues within our field, such as lack of racial diversity in awards like the NIH New Innovator Award and among conference speakers. After the initial presentation, trainee-led, bi-weekly-structured discussions were maintained. First, discussions focused broadly on any DEI related topic to enhance general knowledge on DEI issues and provide discussion comfort among the group. Second, there was a period to deepen knowledge of a specific topic (in our example, microaggressions), which was followed up with a period of discussions on potential solutions (such as how to react when observing a microaggression and what to do in response to realizing one’s own microaggression). Students reported that our discussions were the only ones they have had in their training thus far, and felt that these discussions made them feel like they belonged in the lab, made the lab more inclusive, enhanced their awareness of how to create inclusive spaces, and taught them about a variety of DEI topics. Overall, our DEI discussions have fostered open conversations within our lab group about DEI-related issues and topics at the lab, department, university, and countrywide levels and has established a space where students feel safe to voice their opinions and ask questions. We hope to ultimately use these DEI discussions to create actionable steps for addressing topics, e.g., microaggressions, in different scenarios that can be applied by group members in their future careers.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
13.6
作者:
Erosheva, Elena A.;Grant, Sheridan;Lee, Carole J.
通讯作者:
Lee, Carole J.
DOI:
10.1187/cbe.18-03-0042
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
CBE—Life Sciences Education
影响因子:
--
作者:
Tennial, Rachel E.;Solomon, Erin D.;Hammonds-Odie, Latanya;McDowell, Gary S.;Moore, Michael;Roca, Alberto I.;Marcette, Jana
通讯作者:
Marcette, Jana
DOI:
10.1073/pnas.1915378117
发表时间:
2020-04-28
影响因子:
11.1
作者:
Hofstra, Bas;Kulkarni, Vivek V.;McFarland, Daniel A.
通讯作者:
McFarland, Daniel A.
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2003
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
JAX
通讯作者:
JAX
DOI:
10.1187/cbe.17-09-0210
发表时间:
2018-06
期刊:
CBE life sciences education
影响因子:
--
作者:
Wilson MA;DePass A;Bean AJ
通讯作者:
Bean AJ