Has the increased participation in the national campaign 'Dry January' been associated with cutting down alcohol consumption in England?
Has the increased participation in the national campaign 'Dry January' been associated with cutting down alcohol consumption in England?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108938
复制
发表时间：
2021-10-01
影响因子：
4.2
通讯作者：
Brown J
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Case P;Angus C;De Vocht F;Holmes J;Michie S;Brown J
干燥的一月与酒精消费量的大幅度下降无关。人们更有可能引用Detox（例如，干燥的一月）作为一个动机，在一月戒烟尝试。引用排毒的人的比例（例如，干燥的一月）全年作为戒烟尝试的原因在2014年至2018年期间增加。Dry January是英国的一项全国性多媒体活动，鼓励人们在一月份戒酒。这项全民运动广泛使用电子邮件和社交媒体来支持参与者，自2015年以来，参与人数大幅增加。这项研究旨在评估2015年至2018年期间参与干燥一月的人数增加是否与英格兰饮酒量减少有关。重复横断面设计。英格兰，2014年3月至2018年1月。共有37，142名受访者参加了酒精工具包研究，这是一项每月对英格兰16岁以上人群的代表性横断面样本进行的酒精消费调查。结果包括i）在过去6个月内每月或更少饮酒的成年人百分比，以及ii）过去6个月内酒精使用障碍识别测试中典型频率和数量的饮酒者平均每周饮酒量。对于每个结果，回归模型拟合月份：1月（2015年和2018年）与3月至12月（2014年和2017年）和年份：2014/15与2017/18。模型中包含了相互作用项，以检查1月与前几个月之间每个结果指标的差异是否取决于年份（2014/15与2017/18）。对于非显著性相互作用，计算贝叶斯因子以评估与零相比大效应的相对证据强度（每月饮酒量OR = 1.80，平均消费量β=-1.0）。2014/15年和2017/18年，报告每月饮酒或饮酒频率较低的成年人和饮酒者的平均饮酒量在1月和其他月份之间的差异相似（OR = 0.91，95% CI 0.79-1.05，BF = 0.05; β = 0.55，95% CI=-0.14至1.25，BF = 0.13）。在2015年至2018年期间，参与干1月的增加与过去6个月每月饮酒或更少饮酒的人的相应变化或饮酒者的平均每周消费量无关。
Dry January was not associated with large population-level declines in alcohol consumption. People were more likely to cite Detox (e.g., Dry January) as a motive in a quit attempt in January. The proportion of people citing Detox (e.g., Dry January) throughout the year as a reason for a quit attempt increased between 2014 and 2018. Dry January is a national multimedia campaign in the UK that encourages people to abstain from drinking alcohol during the month of January. The population-level campaign makes extensive use of email and social media to support participants and has reported a substantial increase in participation since 2015. This study aimed to assess whether the increase in participation in Dry January between 2015 and 2018 was associated with reduced alcohol consumption in England. Repeat cross-sectional design. England, March 2014 to January 2018. A total of 37,142 respondents to the Alcohol Toolkit Study, a monthly in-home survey of alcohol consumption among representative cross-sectional samples of people aged 16+ years in England. Outcomes included i) percentage of adults reporting drinking monthly or less frequently in the last 6 months and ii) mean weekly alcohol consumption among drinkers derived from the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test questions on typical frequency and quantity in the last 6 months. For each outcome, regression models were fitted for month: January (2015 and 2018) vs March-December (2014 and 2017) and for year: 2014/15 vs 2017/18. Interaction terms were included in the models to examine whether the difference between January and the preceding months on each outcome measure depended upon the year (2014/15 vs 2017/18). For non-significant interactions, Bayes factors were calculated to assess the relative strength of evidence for large effects (OR = 1.80 on monthly drinking and β=-1.0 on mean consumption) compared with the null. Differences between January and other months were similar in 2014/15 and 2017/18 for adults reporting drinking monthly or less frequently and the mean consumption among drinkers (OR = 0.91, 95 %CI 0.79–1.05, BF = 0.05; β = 0.55, 95 %CI=-0.14 to 1.25, BF = 0.13 respectively). The increase in participation in Dry January between 2015 and 2018 was not associated with large corresponding changes in people drinking monthly or less frequently over the last 6 months, or in mean weekly consumption among drinkers.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
de Visser, Richard O.;Robinson, Emily;Walmsley, Matthew
通讯作者：
Walmsley, Matthew
影响因子：
3.8
作者：
Bartram, Ashlea;Eliott, Jaklin;Crabb, Shona
通讯作者：
Crabb, Shona
DOI：
10.15288/jsa.1993.54.157
发表时间：
1993-03-01
期刊：
JOURNAL OF STUDIES ON ALCOHOL
影响因子：
--
作者：
LEMMENS, PHHM;KNIBBE, RA
通讯作者：
KNIBBE, RA
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Knudsen AK;Skogen JC
通讯作者：
Skogen JC
影响因子：
--
作者：
Bush, K;Kivlahan, DR;Bradley, KA
通讯作者：
Bradley, KA